Re: [libreplanet-discuss] startpage.com and archive.org use JS differently

2015-03-25 Thread klez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Regarding Startpage, I researched further. It seems that the content is loaded, but hidden with a CSS rule.[0] I'm not sure why this happens. If I disable LibreJS for the page, everything works fine. [0] #page-wrapper { visibility: hi

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] startpage.com and archive.org use JS differently

2015-03-24 Thread klez
By "activating the new beta" I meant clicking on the link that lets you try the new version, because I thought the link I gave wasn't enough, but I'm starting to suspect that the behaviour is caused by LibreJS. I'll research further tomorrow when I'll be at my computer. Greetings klez Il 24 ma

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] startpage.com and archive.org use JS differently

2015-03-24 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
klez wrote: That's weird, are you sure you activated the new beta? It didn't display search results for me, while the "classic" version worked fine. Please explain what you mean by "activat[ing] the new beta". I visited the URL you provided, submitted searches, and saw results without JS turn

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] startpage.com and archive.org use JS differently

2015-03-24 Thread klez
Il 24 marzo 2015 00:12:48 CET, "J.B. Nicholson-Owens" ha scritto: >> >> * Startpage: https://new.startpage.com/ > >I can use this page to submit searches without Javascript. I can also >see and visit the list of hits I get in return, all without Javascript >enabled. The browser shortcuts I'

[libreplanet-discuss] startpage.com and archive.org use JS differently

2015-03-23 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
klez wrote: I've noticed a couple of site that at the moment work quite well without JavaScript enabled, but are rolling out new JS heavy versions that don't work at all if scripts are disabled. In particular, I'm singling out: * Startpage: https://new.startpage.com/ I can use this page to