> Purism is a company, if you have a problem with that company, complain
> to that.
Read the initial post. The message is directed at fsf and
libreplanet officials. Others answered and I decided not
to ignore their posts. I responded. About purism, they
know because they have been told.
Hello,
* a via libreplanet-discuss [2020-03-12
04:18]:
> > If I understand correctly...
> >
> > First, you criticise Purism for saying that soon they would be supported
> > by the FSF.
> > Then, you criticise the FSF for having supported Purism soon after that.
> >
> > What's wrong??
>
>
> I
On 3/11/20 9:11 PM, Stanisława Pałętka wrote:
> W dniu środa, 11 marca 2020 a via libreplanet-discuss <
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> napisał(a):
>
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
>>
Félicien Pillot, 11/03/20 23:05:
What's wrong??
ninhar has raised such topics earlier in the Replicant mailing list, see
for instance:
https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/replicant/2019-November/002268.html
"Report from 36C3" is AFAICT the best summary of the status of play as
we know it.
I got aware, I have made a big mistake. The subject
should have said
purism why does fsf and libreplanet embrace
misleading company?
I will restart my post having the correct subject
and a couple of adjustments in the text.
People can then resend their responses to the
new post.
Can they posts I
a via libreplanet-discuss, 11/03/20 23:58:
And a link is
easier to share.
This mailing list has a public archive which you can link just fine and
doesn't require JavaScript to be read:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2020-03/msg00033.html
So, no, your external text is
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 20:10:09 +0100, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
> and fsf.
>
> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
> https://paste.nolsen.xyz/?98e7462461e8a46c#8YchW86Fn3UvkxdHbfN74cVVoYkFqCGWCx2tWVX5uvZJ
Would you mind pasting the
> If I understand correctly...
>
> First, you criticise Purism for saying that soon they would be supported
> by the FSF.
> Then, you criticise the FSF for having supported Purism soon after that.
>
> What's wrong??
I am criticizing purism for fraudulent behavior. I say purism
is using fsf in
My post is about getting official comments from
libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
reply, but I already know how people attempt
to defend purism's behavior.
On 3/11/20 8:48 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, you believe: Purism marketing talks about
> software freedom
In my opinion moving in one step from all closed source to all open
source freedom respecting is very hard or practically impossible. I am
happy people are doing steps towards all open source and no hidden
stuff. One valid step is modern hardware running open source Operating
System
I'm not really sure how Purism is any worse than companies like Think
Penguin, or than the machines are any less freedom respecting than
anything else that can run a FSF endorsed distro and coreboot. Even
some new system76 machines are running coreboot now from what I
understand.
Hi "a",
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:10:09 +0100
a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
> and fsf.
>
> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
> https://paste.nolsen.xyz/?98e7462461e8a46c#8YchW86Fn3UvkxdHbfN74cVVoYkFqCGWCx2tWVX5uvZJ
If I understand
This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
and fsf.
I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
https://paste.nolsen.xyz/?98e7462461e8a46c#8YchW86Fn3UvkxdHbfN74cVVoYkFqCGWCx2tWVX5uvZJ
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
