Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:15:18 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:41:30 +0800
>From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>
>
> >As I thi
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:01:48 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
Thanks for the various info on sound cards David. It may give me a few
leads for locating sources for working out kinks with this WavJammer.
Hopefull
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:41:30 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>As I think Neil pointed out in a post coming up, old 486 systems with 8MB used to be
>able to record audio pretty darned well. So there may just be some tweak
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:31:56 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
to Infrared.
>>>
>>>Pres, you're missing the obvious!!!
>>>You know how a null modem
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:20:30 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>From: "Gerhard Kapusta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi Matt!
>
>Iv' tryed it, but without success.
>
>The internal sound does not meet my high demand of qual
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:08:30 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
> > Okay... IPX/SPX are installed on each Lib, and Dial-Up Adaptor on both
>already had bindings to IPX/SPX, NetBEUI, and TCP/IP.< <
> >
> > I still had no luck connecting wi
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:34:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>From the Libretto Mailing List archives:
From: adorable@ <>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:00:55 -0800 (PST)
See: http://www2.toshiba.co.jp/pc/libr
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:57:30 -0500
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
> > I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
> > to Infrared.
>
> Pres, you're missing the obvious!!!
> You know how a null modem cable has the two wires c
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:17:33 -0500
From: Tom Wilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIBRETTO] Libretto Digest #1634
I have Windows 2000 Pro on my ff1100v. I have everything working except the remote
and the button that operates the camera.
I could not get the scoopy software to operate t
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 21:45:33 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
At 05:10 AM 27/03/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:00:42 +0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>
>>> I would go back to a serial
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:28:12 -0500
From: "Markus Benne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: unsubscribe
**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives
http://www.picante.com/~gta
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:00:42 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>> I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
>> to Infrared.
>
> Pres, you're missing the obvious!!!
> You know how a null modem cable has the two wires
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:49:24 +0100
From: Christian Gennerat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
Raymond a écrit :
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:31:21 +0800
> From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>
> At 04:05 AM 27/03/2002 -0800, y
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 20:31:21 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
At 04:05 AM 27/03/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:58:16 +0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>
I would go back to a serial CA
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:58:16 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>>> I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
>>> to Infrared.
>>
>> Pres, you're missing the obvious!!!
>> You know how a null modem cable has the two wires crossed over?
>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:36:29
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:11:33 +0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
>
> > I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
> > to I
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:35:31
From: "neil barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:19:38 +0100
>From: "Gerhard Kapusta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
>
>Hi Matt!
>
>Iv
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:11:33 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Infra red for 2 Libs?
> I would go back to a serial CABLE, get DCC working, THEN swing
> to Infrared.
Pres, you're missing the obvious!!!
You know how a null modem cable has the two wires crossed over?
So, I reckon
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:19:38 +0100
From: "Gerhard Kapusta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AW: [LIB] Has no one played with recording audio?
Hi Matt!
Iv' tryed it, but without success.
The internal sound does not meet my high demand of quality.
PCMCIA soundcards are rare and very expensive.
So
19 matches
Mail list logo