Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:41:45 +0100
From: Mikkel Breiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Server time/date stamps
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:06:27 -0800, "Matt Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But the what's with the 3-4 >day< delay?
The stacked mails are put on hold as the machine that s
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:58 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BIOS 8GB Limit - Fix?
List Folk,
I tripped over this page months ago, bookmarked it, and forgot about it until
today. It appears to be a fix for the Libretto's (L100CT) infamous HDD size
restriction.
http://bockey.ipcon.de/M
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:20:52 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] BIOS 8GB Limit - Fix?
In a message dated 1/15/2004 12:10:37 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> List Folk,
>
> I tripped over this page months ago, bookmarked it, and forgot about it
> until
> t
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:21:40 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] BIOS 8GB Limit - Fix?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 1/15/2004 12:10:37 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > List Folk,
> >
> > I tripped over this page months ag
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:19:57 +
From: "Matt Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: List posts - problems yet again...
I see my post the other day hasn't come back to me yet. Still not sure if
you folks are getting my posts before I do.
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:46:02 -0800 (PST)
From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Server time/date stamps
Whatever the delay on your side, it's not happening with Yahoo! Mail (maybe
time to switch?). Yesterday's post that I made came through almost
immediately, so right now, th
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:52:39 -0800 (PST)
From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] BIOS 8GB Limit - Fix?
Looks like a DOS program (from the description) that calculates the correct
BIOS values for the HD and stores them in memory (not permenantly of course;
at least from the fas
