> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V. Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: Libtool
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] libtool-1.3d
>
>
> After 21 months in heavy development, the Libtool Team is
> pleased to announce
> alpha release 1.3d of GNU libtool. If
After 21 months in heavy development, the Libtool Team is pleased to announce
alpha release 1.3d of GNU libtool. If this release generates a low number of
bug reports, libtool-1.4 could be just a few short weeks away!
libtool-1.3d is be available from alpha.gnu.org and via anonymous CVS, using
On Monday 02 April 2001 2:31 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is fast becoming a large post-1.4 issue to my mind...
>
> What? Did you really mean to have this problem addresses in 1.4?
Yeah, I though it was going to be a simple
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is fast becoming a large post-1.4 issue to my mind...
What? Did you really mean to have this problem addresses in 1.4? 1.4
doesn't even have piecewise linking, IIRC.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.un
On Monday 02 April 2001 12:49 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that even if there are, there is little option but to do
> > platformwise duplicate removal if we are to avoid common problems with
> > command line lengths.
>
> Ye
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB).
Thanks
> Okay to release 1.3d?
Ok with me.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnu
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> > Certainly for modern UNIX architectures, however, I get the impression
>> > from Alexandre that there are platforms which do re
Hello.
On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > I see. Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably
> > > generate excessively large link commands for KDE.
> >
> > Yes it does =(O| Although ugly, Robert has applied the f
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > I see. Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably generate
> > excessively large link commands for KDE.
>
> Yes it does =(O| Although ugly, Robert has applied the following to MLB so
> that portability at least is not affected
Hello.
On Sunday 01 April 2001 1:16 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > > I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB).
> > >
> > > Why also MLB? Was it really broken there too? I ask, because I
> > > _definitely_ got multiple libraries in li
On Thursday 08 March 2001 9:09 pm, Lars Stavholm wrote:
> > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2
> > -Lc:/ossasn1/win32.tgt/5.2.0/bin -o libencdec.la -rpath
> > /home/stava/proj/nbap_alcap/encdec/lib -no-undefined -release 6.1C
> > decoder_main.lo decoder_translate.lo decoder_util.lo encoder
On Thursday 15 February 2001 4:47 am, Sam TH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la
On Sunday 01 April 2001 12:18 pm, s_a_white wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using libtool 1.3c for a while due to needing it so dependency
> information is correctly obtained from the la files. However, I came to
> build a binary which uses libtool libraries and found that this version
> detects that
On Friday 30 March 2001 3:54 am, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> I was wondering what the status is for supporting C++ on Win32 in the
> multi-language branch of libtool.
The g++ support for win32 should not be any worse than for other libtool
supported platforms.
> In particular I would like to know
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >
> > > I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB).
> >
> > Why also MLB? Was it really broken there too? I ask, because I
> > _definitely_ got multiple libraries in link commands.
>
> Try out the new depdemo-dups.test on an old
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:50 am, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> > > >> duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
> > > >
> > > > Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What
Hi,
I've been using libtool 1.3c for a while due to needing it so dependency
information is correctly obtained from the la files. However, I came to
build a binary which uses libtool libraries and found that this version
detects that my system should use an executable extention of ".C". This is
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> > >> duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
> > >
> > > Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What is this bug exactly?
> >
> > There is this chunk of code that remo
18 matches
Mail list logo
