"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
>
> > > If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static
> > > archive into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do.
Hi Folks,
I got an answer from comp.unix.sco.programmer.
On Friday 20 April 2001 4:50 am, Chris Leishman wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 08:05 AM, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> > Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Everything compiles ok, but the dlopen fails with the error "not a
> >> Mach-O MH_BUNDLE file type" (this error message is output
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Apr 18, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, I just deleted my savannah#2 certificate, and I can can now
> > get in.
>
> Me too. Sorry about the noise.
>
I am truly sorry this was necessary. I don't know yet why the
new
On Apr 19, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the kind of problem deplib tests are supposed to catch
I lied :-)
Thanks Gary for setting me straight.
We should definitely make one of the deplib libraries static.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.uni