Re: shared library linking on Darwin

"Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Have either of you had any success with my workaround? > >make ECHO="/bin/sh `pwd`/libtool --fallback-echo" > > Or something equivalent... Not quite sure I understand. Should that be ECHO=/bin/echo on the configure command? Doesn't seem t

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

On Apr 21, 2001, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This would also help handle -R on Solaris and stuff like that. If it could handle a list of packages at once, yes, it would probably help on other systems such as DU too. But the main problem with DU is that -rpath flags override pr

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

On Apr 21, 2001, Eric Lemings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.0 spawned a separate tool called pkg-config that allows all packages > to use one tool rather than several different scripts to query compile > flags, link flags, and other configuration data. What I don't understand is how pkg-config

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

On Apr 21, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2001-04-11 Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * ltmain.in: Mark duplicate libraries appearing in predeps and > postdeps as specialdeplibs. Explain the whole plan. > How come this patch isn't also in HEAD? It

Re: libtool-1.4

Gary V. Vaughan writes: > Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less > than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD. I think that's going to be a problem for you: libtool$ make dist make: *** No rule to make target `ltconfig', needed by `di

Re: Missing header on Uw7

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:25 am, Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Hi Matt, > > Sorry for the slow response. Np. I'm sure you're busy. Your patch worked. Yes, the dlopen API is available. The only other thing I noticed was this section in libltdl/c

Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > Well, I don't know which combinations of triplets we need to accept and > reject for pass_all deplibs, so this could probably use some tweaking... but > the attached patch is the sort of thing you are looking for I think. Let me > know asap so we can get this in be

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > Yes, I have been thinking about this. Although I was planning on writing a > macro for autoconf-2.50 which would help generate the foo-config scripts. I > think your idea is a much better approach, and I'll add it to the TODO list > presently. Thanks. You mean I act

Re: libtool-1.4

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less > than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD. > > I would be grateful for any host triplets (as reported by > the libtool configure s

¡ó¡ó¡óFlying Shose!!¡ó¡óFlying Shose!!¡ó¡ó¡ó

Title: flyshose ¡EIf you can't see (and hear) the above animation, you should install Shockwave Flash CHINESE   NOTE ânÚ(–f¢–)à–+-.&í¢‰`žê+‚m§ÿæj)`žê+ƒùšŠYšŸùb²Ø§~å‰»h¢

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

Hi, I'm all for it, but someone has to do the work. ;-) This would also help handle -R on Solaris and stuff like that. Havoc ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

libtool-1.4

Hi everyone, Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD. I would be grateful for any host triplets (as reported by the libtool configure script) on which you are able to run

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

Hi Eric, On Saturday 21 April 2001 6:12 pm, Eric Lemings wrote: > Because of a growing number of config scripts for packages in GNOME 1.2 > (e.g. glib-config, xml-config, orbit-config. etc), development of GNOME > 2.0 spawned a separate tool called pkg-config that allows all packages > to use on

Libtool and Pkg-Config

Because of a growing number of config scripts for packages in GNOME 1.2 (e.g. glib-config, xml-config, orbit-config. etc), development of GNOME 2.0 spawned a separate tool called pkg-config that allows all packages to use one tool rather than several different scripts to query compile flags, link

Re: Missing header on Uw7

On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:25 am, Matthew Schalit wrote: > Hi Folks, Hi Matt, Sorry for the slow response. > On SCO UnixWare 7.1.1, the header file is > found as . > > I just checked out CVS libtool today, and it looks like > I'll have to change a few files: > > $ find . | xargs fgrep -l "d

¡½¡½¡½Flying shose!!¡½¡½¡½Flying shose!!¡½¡½

Title: flyshose ¡EIf you can't see (and hear) the above animation, you should install Shockwave Flash CHINESE   NOTE ânÚ(–f¢–)à–+-.&í¢‰`žê+‚m§ÿæj)`žê+ƒùšŠYšŸùb²Ø§~å‰»h¢

Re: 1.4 and hardcode.test on Solaris 2.6 with Sun C

On Thursday 19 April 2001 5:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The hardcode.test doesn't work for Sun C: > $ cc -V > cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 C 5.2 2000/09/11 > > I looked at hd-direct with: > cat $file | (tr '\000-\037\200-\377' '\n' || cat) > and found the following: > ... > DYNAMIC

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

On Thursday 19 April 2001 9:31 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 18, 2001, Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian > > duplicate removal in dependency tracking. > > Err... Was it really removed? I thought we had decided to ke

Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

> "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static > > > > archive into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do. On Friday 20 April 2001 9:57 pm, Matthew Schalit wrote: > I got an answer from comp.unix.sco.programmer. Okay Cool.