Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> > b) why is it just bigcaps drive-letters? > > Ditto. Although I guess this comes from the spec file, so maybe more > care _is_ needed after all? It doesn't come from the specs file, remember that the mingw gcc can be installed freely in any location, and the specs file isn't edited when

Re: [Fwd: on IRIX a *.so..1 link is needed to run program]

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:48:19PM -0700, Ted Irons wrote: > Here is an eg of the error message I get: > > 1415148:./testSim: rld: Fatal Error: Cannot Successfully map soname 'libView.so..1' >under any of the filenames > >/postfix/ironst/sde/LADARDataModel/IRIX64-6.5/lib/libView.so..1:/postfix/

Re: Problem with finding included ltdll.c and impgen.c on Cygwin

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:57:52AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > In current CVS libtool.m4, the code that outputs the included ltdll.c > and impgen.c is indented four spaces. Including the lines with > _LT_AC_FILE_LTDLL_C and _LT_AC_FILE_IMPGEN_C. Thus the start marker > lines also get indented in

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote: > Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > > -- Small improvement for mingw-hosted tool support (while still > > running libtool on cygwin). In that case PATH_SEPARATOR is ':', but > > gcc -print-search-dirs still prints its search path with ';' as

Re: HEAD and different C, C++ compilers

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:33:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does HEAD support *different* a different C and C++ compiler (e.g. > native vendor C and GNU C++)? The tags language tags are supposed to be completely independent, so if you find a case where config for one tag bleeds out and s

Re: use of __STDC__ in libtool.m4 on HEAD

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:43:26PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >From libtool.m4 in HEAD branch: > > #if defined (__STDC__) && __STDC__ > # define lt_ptr_t void * > #else > # define lt_ptr_t char * > # define const > #endif > > Why? Some C compilers define __STDC__ but don't define it to 1.