Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Earnie Boyd
Elizabeth Barham wrote: What is the MSYS-team's view on this? I'm fine with it and will support the change to a constant. Should that constant be adjusted based on w9x vs NT? Earnie. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.or

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
"Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Don't worry about me! I think we are working towards broadly similar goals - > it shouldn't be much effort for me to merge the changes you are making into > my stuff. What I'm wondering is of there is a better variable to use with the import library, as

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Max Bowsher
Elizabeth Barham wrote: >This patch allowed libMagick++ to compile on my machine. > >The one thing that concerns me is the name of the import library is > hard-coded ${lib}.a, which is okay in that the import library looks > like "qqq.dll.a" but Max has something going about putting DLLs wi

[ 100265 ] configure.in missing in CVS tree

2002-10-11 Thread nobody
Support Request #100265, was updated on 2001-Dec-31 16:06 You can respond by visiting: http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=100265&group_id=25 Category: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Summary: configure.in missing in CVS tree By: rboehne Date: 2002-Oct-11 16:11 Logged

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On 11 Oct 2002, Elizabeth Barham wrote: >This patch allowed libMagick++ to compile on my machine. Great. I'll give it a try tomorrow. >The one thing that concerns me is the name of the import library is > hard-coded ${lib}.a, which is okay in that the import library looks > like "qqq.dl

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob, all, This patch allowed libMagick++ to compile on my machine. The one thing that concerns me is the name of the import library is hard-coded ${lib}.a, which is okay in that the import library looks like "qqq.dll.a" but Max has something going about putting DLLs with the executables and

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The exact same error message is reported without -shared. >From what I can tell, during configure, there is a check for any object files that are included in a C++ link. This object file is then later used to build the shared archive. If you look at

libtool on Darwin

2002-10-11 Thread F J Franklin
Hi y'all, Sorry for being so quiet on this issue. I'm not going to say anything about 1.4.2, since I'm only familiar with CVS. Nice of Jaguar to use bash these days, but I still get a lot of broken tests. I have a couple of fixes at home but I don't know whether they fix causes or symptoms... an

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Guido Draheim
Elizabeth Barham wrote: >yes,mingw*) > -library_names_spec='${libname}`echo ${release} | sed -e >'s/[[.]]/-/g'`${versuffix}.dll' > +soname_spec='$libname.dll' > +library_names_spec='$libname.dll.a' don't cut away the "release" spec. libtool link --release 10.56 -o libfoo.la

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
This is a new patch in attempts to correct the strange behavior, but note, IT DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY YET. I am posting this because I have a very specific question about the naming of the library. This patch, as it is, causes configure to print out: checking which extension is used for shared l

test to see if the mailing list is working

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
test. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Bug in lt_dlerror

2002-10-11 Thread John Gruenenfelder
I think I have found my source of "unknown error" messages in my program. I was checking the return value of lt_dlerror() to see if any errors might have occured. I believe the autobook says this is a good idea. And it used to work too. The documentation for lt_dlerror() says: - Function: cons