[no subject]

2003-01-15 Thread workathome1002000
How about getting paid to shop please check out this great new program! >Click here to find out more information! <

RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran)

2003-01-15 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) Steve, I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when compiling Fortran. Thanks, Robert -Original Message- From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran)

2003-01-15 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:22:15PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote: I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when compiling Fortran. Why should -DPIC be passed at all for any compiler? Thanks, Robert -Original Message- From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC Albert, Good point, we never really resolved this issue. All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I! Robert -Original Message- From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:11 PM

Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:23:33PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote: Good point, we never really resolved this issue. All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I! WE :) Robert -Original Message- From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:11 PM

Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Good point, we never really resolved this issue. All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I! I'm against it. If you have optimized assembler versions of some code for some platforms (like the STL has, for example) and some of that code is not PIC, it is a good idea to enclose it in

RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC Ok then, I'll see if I can make -DPIC into a conditionally-set thing that would be set to for anything but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;) Robert -Original Message- From: Simon Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Richter
Robert, Ok then, I'll see if I can make -DPIC into a conditionally-set thing that would be set to for anything but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;) Yes, although it would be nice if the other languages also had a way of knowing they should emit PIC, at least if they allow conditional

RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC Simon, I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so important, why doesn't the

Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC

2003-01-15 Thread Simon Richter
Robert, I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so important, why doesn't the compiler define it for you? Current gcc defines __PIC__ and