How about getting paid to shop
please check out this great new program!
>Click here to find out more information!
<
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran)
Steve,
I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when
compiling Fortran.
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:22:15PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote:
I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when
compiling Fortran.
Why should -DPIC be passed at all for any compiler?
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Albert,
Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:11 PM
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:23:33PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote:
Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I!
WE :)
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:11 PM
Hi,
Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say I!
I'm against it.
If you have optimized assembler versions of some code for some platforms
(like the STL has, for example) and some of that code is not PIC, it is
a good idea to enclose it in
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Ok then, I'll see if I can make -DPIC into
a conditionally-set thing that would be set to for anything
but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;)
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Simon Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Robert,
Ok then, I'll see if I can make -DPIC into
a conditionally-set thing that would be set to for anything
but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;)
Yes, although it would be nice if the other languages also had a way of
knowing they should emit PIC, at least if they allow conditional
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Simon,
I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than
C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler
in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so
important, why doesn't the
Robert,
I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than
C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler
in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so
important, why doesn't the compiler define it for you?
Current gcc defines __PIC__ and
10 matches
Mail list logo