Hi Bob,
thank you for your quick reply. Maybe my e-mails from my yahoo.com
address just got trapped in Rob's spam filter. ;) I'll resubscribe to
libtool mailing lists from this account.
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Libtool is certainly being maintained. We have been unnofficially
That's good news.
On 2003-07-05(Sat) 14:09:40 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Other than identifying the problem, I don't really know how to correct
the remaining issue. But in this message
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2003-05/msg00022.html
I posted a test case that demonstrates the issue; if
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Abel Cheung wrote:
On 2003-07-05(Sat) 14:09:40 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Other than identifying the problem, I don't really know how to correct
the remaining issue. But in this message
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2003-05/msg00022.html
I posted a
Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Libtool is certainly being maintained. We have been unnofficially
We have a few small patches for libtool in kaffe's current CVS. So I'd
like libtool to profit from the work that has gone into fixing the
small issues, just
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 11:18, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Thanks, for an outsider like me, it's hard to understand a project's
internal social structure. I've got one more question, though: how do
you handle external patches from distributors? Do you hunt down their
patches trying to integrate
Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 11:18, Dalibor Topic wrote:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.4.3-10.diff.gz
etc.
As the Debian Libtool package maintainer, I'd like to know whether it
would be possible to gain CVS commit access to the libtool
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 02:40, Charles Wilson wrote:
Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 11:18, Dalibor Topic wrote:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.4.3-10.diff.gz
etc.
As the Debian Libtool package maintainer, I'd like to know whether
it
