Hi Bob,
thank you very much for your quick reply, and taking my concerns seriously.
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Salut Nicholas, hello Bob,
The somewhat bad part is that we have discovered several problems with
libtool 1.5, ranging from hour-long configure
Hi Paul,
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Lars J. Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Is it possible that this is a local problem for the given MKS user I
: am working with and that he may have a somewhat faulty MKS
: installation or something?
:
: Possibly. It'd be nice if we could have
Hi,
we've recently had a bug report about cross compiling kaffe for
arm-linux. It turned out that libtool was picking the wrong libjpeg
library, the one from the host system instead of the one from the target
system. See the end of
http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2003-July/042988.html
On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 07:12 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Becoming a maintainer involves
signing a contract with the FSF (takes two or three weeks) and being
set up with CVS commit privileges.
Is this contract the same as the copyright assignment?
I'd like a commit bit to apply darwin
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'm sorry about my confusing wording. While I have received interesting
replys to my critique of the process, I have not received a response on
the patch itself, except from an ironical remark about open source
developers and vacation. ;)
That was
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Our patches are against libtool 1.5, I hope that's current enough.
Patches against current CVS libtool are definitely preferred even
though this puts more burden on the patch submitter. The easier and
less risky your patch is to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Sure. the patch I sent (and two others I have) applies to kaffe's
/cvs/kaffe/kaffe/libltdl/acinclude.m4 which corresponds to libtool's
libtool.m4. I can resend the patch against the current libtool CVS if
you would please take a look at it. It is a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 08:25:06PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The proper way to fix it could be to do a binary search over multiples
of 2 instead of the linear search emplyed now. Use a resonable minamal
value like 2**13, which leaves only a few options between 2**13 and
2**17, which is
To my knowledge, all of the outstanding libtool patches which have
been submitted to the libtool mailing lists and which are not subject
to further discussion or copyright assignment, have been been applied
to libtool CVS.
Distribution maintainers who have made fixes to the libtool in their
