Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
So all that is needed is for libtool to accept .lib as an extension
and for libtool to (possibly naively) assume that if a similarly-named
DLL exists that the .lib file is a DLL link library?
Yes and no. For one thing, there is no r
GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA
Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and the respect of
all?
Call this number: 1-917- 591- 5067 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews!
Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
Receive
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 06:28, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> Libtool maintenance notes are in the Maintaining node of the texinfo
> docs.
> Contribution guidelines are on the web:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html
Thanks, these look like good starting points.
Tristan
_
Title: Buscamos Distribuidores
Oferta única e inmejorablede pertenecer al
sectorde las Telecomunicaciones.
Este e-mail va
dirigido a [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Si desea ser borr
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 18:45, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Ah, thanks! Sorry for being dense, but since it takes
> tag names as argument, why is it called _LT_LANG?
>
Because it actually takes language configuration names, which just
happen to be the same as the tags that get generated. (Ther
>>> "Scott" == Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 08:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >>> "Scott" == Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Scott> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:39, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >> Is it done or is there any
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 08:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Scott" == Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Scott> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:39, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >> Is it done or is there any obstacle to it? I'm dreaming about
> >> Automake 1.9, and if possible I
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >
> More or less the same. There may be a few differences. However,
> binutils have been able to read the MS produced .lib files for some
> years now.
So all that is needed is for libtool to accept .lib as an extension
and for libtool to (possibly naivel
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Bill Jones wrote:
I have considered this but do not see it as a practical solution. I do
not think that it should be the responsibility of every developer to
make a copy of a file simply because the extension is not what libtool
likes. The .lib ext
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Bill Jones wrote:
> I have considered this but do not see it as a practical solution. I do
> not think that it should be the responsibility of every developer to
> make a copy of a file simply because the extension is not what libtool
> likes. The .lib extension is a valid e
I have considered this but do not see it as a practical solution. I do
not think that it should be the responsibility of every developer to
make a copy of a file simply because the extension is not what libtool
likes. The .lib extension is a valid extension to Windows and it seems
more approp
Thanks, but I tried this without success as noted in attempt 4) in my
original post. It is my understanding that you should not link directly
against a Windows .dll file, but instead link against the import library
(.lib). In any event, "-Lpath -lfoo" does produce my DLL when path was
set to
Tim Van Holder wrote:
Bill Jones wrote:
So the basic question is how do I specify a static import library
with a *.lib extension to be used by libtool for resolving the
symbols provided by a non-libtool DLL when building a dependent DLL
with libtool?
The trivial solution is of course to make
Lack of Schooling Holding back Your Career?
Call 1-206-309-7258 to inquire about our degree
programs.
Weather you are seeking a Bachelors, Masters, Ph.D. or MBA
We can provide you with the fully verifiable credentials to
get your career BACK ON TRACK
No testing or coursework required
Call: 1-206
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Apr 2004, at 00:19, Albert Chin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
On 14 Apr 2004, at 18:55, Albert Chin wrote:
I already have it done for Solaris, HP-UX, Tru64 UNIX, and IRIX. My
patch is for the 1.5 branch. I
Thank you for your valuable time.
I will keep this advertisement short and to the point. I also have massive amounts
of email to sort through daily. Perhaps you should save this ad for a more convenient time in
your busy schedule.
Here is a website that advertises for, among other things,
In
>>> "Scott" == Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:39, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> Is it done or is there any obstacle to it? I'm dreaming about
>> Automake 1.9, and if possible I would like to include support
>> for this.
>>
Scott> The curre
17 matches
Mail list logo
