On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:43:57PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > > If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
> > > is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler
Javascript(doctorate (phd) diploma)
Action: Delete
*** End of message ***
-- next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Libtool Digest, Vol 17, Issue 11
Date: no date
Size: 13919
Url: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool/attachments/200
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Tristan Fillmore wrote:
: I am interested in working on libtool to add support for shared
: libraries on Interix. I've downloaded the 1.5.6 release, but I don't
: see anything as far as a HACKING file...
There is a patch now on the libtool-patches list which implements Inter
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:21:11PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
> > is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the
> > program. Otherwise C++
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Shouldn't the developer be responsible for using the C++ compiler
> > rather than the C compiler? Why should libtool solve this? Without
> > libtool, the developer should be using the C++ compiler to link
> > anyway.
>
> Perhaps this is an automake p
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
> > is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the
> > program. Otherwise C++ static initializati
Albert Chin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the
program. Otherwise C++ static initialization may not work right, or
linking
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
> is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the
> program. Otherwise C++ static initialization may not work right, or
> linking may fail enti
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Tristan Fillmore wrote:
: > There is a patch now on the libtool-patches list which implements Interix 3
: > support. I created this in order to support libtool on Interix inside
: > NetBSD's pkgsrc packaging system.
:
: Great! But, maybe I'm dense but I'm having trouble find
non-MS import libraries don't have the same
'feature').
--
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:07:57 +0600
From: "Maggie Dawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Permanently increase the size of your manhood
To: "Libtool" <[
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 07:49, Todd Vierling wrote:
> There is a patch now on the libtool-patches list which implements Interix 3
> support. I created this in order to support libtool on Interix inside
> NetBSD's pkgsrc packaging system.
Great! But, maybe I'm dense but I'm having trouble finding i
If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which
is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the
program. Otherwise C++ static initialization may not work right, or
linking may fail entirely. Libtool doesn't currently offer any
provision to do that.
The ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay West wrote:
| FreeBSD 4.9
| libtool 1.5
| automake 1.75
| autoconf 2.57
|
| I'm new to autoconf & friends. I'm going through the autobook and reading
| how all things are supposed to work. So far I've got my project GNUized
| pretty much and most of
I don't think that linking directly against a DLL under Windows is a
good idea (or even possible). From
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/01/12/57833.aspx it would
appear that the LIB file should be used to account for any "decorations"
added to the exports.
wtj
Earnie Boyd wrot
It's N'ew, Its Safe!
It's The Most Advanced Pen'ile Enla`rgement Solution!
It's 10`0% Guara.nteed To Inc`rease Your Pe'nis si'ze by 3+ In'ches
RE`AD M'ORE IN.FO HE.RE
no
more emai'lz
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mai
15 matches
Mail list logo
