Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:59:33AM -0500, > Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 30 lines which said: > > > If you use libltdl to do module loading rather than raw dlopen() > > I hesitate. What are the p

weekly specials for Microsoft, Corel, McAfee and Autodesk OEM software condescension

2004-06-02 Thread Elizabeth Schneider
Title: tenneco Opt-in Email offer for May 2004   unsubscribe me SEARCH Software   TOP 10 TITLES  ON SALE NOW! 1 Windows XP Pro 2 Office XP Pro 3 Photoshop 8.0 CS 4 Flash MX 2004 5 Acrobat 6.0 6 Corel Graphics 12 7 Systemworks Pro 2004 E

PRODUCTS INTRODUCTION (for libtool@gnu.org)

2004-06-02 Thread HSIAO
=== TAIWAN FU KUNG INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. 18 TONG KUAN STREET, SAN MIN DIST., KAOHSIUNG, TAIWAN E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: 886-7-3126142 === DATE: JUNE 02, 2004 TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: PRODUCTS

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Jay West
Re: libltdl > > I hesitate. What are the pros and cons? I do not really want to add > > yet another dependency to my program. I recently went through the switch from dlopen to libltdl for my project. I must say it was quite straightforward. The changes required to the existing source were trivial,

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:59:33AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said: If you use libltdl to do module loading rather than raw dlopen() I hesitate. What are the pros and cons? I do not really want to add y

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:59:33AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > If you use libltdl to do module loading rather than raw dlopen() I hesitate. What are the pros and cons? I do not really want to add yet another dependency to my program.

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:45:35AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: If you are willing to build and link your loadable modules using libtool, then it as simple as linking using libtool's -module option.

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:45:35AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: > If you are willing to build and link your loadable modules using > libtool, then it as simple as linking using libtool's -module > option. The problem is not the building of

Re: Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: [Feel free to redirect to the proper mailing list if it is not a libtool problem, after all.] I have a program with binary plugins. It loads them by dlopen(3). I develop on Debian/Linux (where you need to pass -dl to the linker) and NetBSD (where you n

Adding the right flags to a program which dlopens

2004-06-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Feel free to redirect to the proper mailing list if it is not a libtool problem, after all.] I have a program with binary plugins. It loads them by dlopen(3). I develop on Debian/Linux (where you need to pass -dl to the linker) and NetBSD (where you need nothing special). I use Autoconf, Automake