Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:12:43PM CET:
I'm working on the Portland Group compilers patch for both the libtool
CVS HEAD and the 1-5 branch (both are attached), and as suggested, am
trying to run the make check test suite against the CVS HEAD (it
passes on the
This is a draft on how to proceed with the link_all_deplibs problem.
The idea is to expose the complexity portably to the user.
The rationale is that people get bitten by this complexity anyway,
so there is little gain in hiding it. At the same time, systems
without needed-following linker should
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:53:25AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[definitions]
my head is already swimming because dependent, dependency and
dependence all are very subtly different and have different
meanings in different contexts.
OK. Let's
Ah -- excellent! I think someone said this (work in the branch-2-0
branch), but I ignored it and worked on the trunk because I foolishly
assumed that they were effectively the same (note to self: your own
development practices are not the same as everyone else's! ;-) ).
On Nov 24, 2004, at
(I figured I'd start this in a different thread so that it would be
easy to find when searching; the patches are identical to what I
submitted before, but in the interest of tying this all up in one
thread...)
I've attached 2 patches to libtool.m4 -- one for branch-1-5 and one for
branch-2-0
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:18:14PM CET:
Ah -- excellent! I think someone said this (work in the branch-2-0
branch), but I ignored it and worked on the trunk because I foolishly
assumed that they were effectively the same
We are in the process of rewriting the testsuite.
This mail is an automated notification from the support tracker
of the project: GNU Libtool.
/**/
[support #100058] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Date:
Hi Peter,
Not meaning to seem overly pedantic, but could you enumerate the release(s)
you tested when you decided that it was safe to close this?
Also, it seems like it would a good item to put into TODO (when you summarise
the hideous TODO thread) that we should add a regression test to the new
Hi,
I again managed to make a commit and forgot to do it properly (so no mail
was sent to libtool-commits), so I filed a support request to get commit
mails handled automatically again:
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitemitem_id=103603
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman -
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Peter,
Not meaning to seem overly pedantic, but could you enumerate the release(s)
you tested when you decided that it was safe to close this?
Also, it seems like it would a good item to put into TODO (when you summarise
the hideous TODO thread) that we should add a
Hi Peter!
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Not meaning to seem overly pedantic, but could you enumerate the
release(s) you tested when you decided that it was safe to close this?
I fixed this particular bug with:
Hi Peter,
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I again managed to make a commit and forgot to do it properly (so no
mail was sent to libtool-commits), so I filed a support request to get
commit mails handled automatically again:
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailitemitem_id=103603
Okay, thanks.
This mail is an automated notification from the support tracker
of the project: GNU Libtool.
/**/
[support #100058] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Date:
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:31:26PM CET:
(I figured I'd start this in a different thread so that it would be
easy to find when searching; the patches are identical to what I
submitted before, but in the interest of tying this all up in one
thread...)
Good idea.
I've
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:53:25AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[definitions]
my head is already swimming because dependent, dependency and
dependence all are very subtly
New ClALlS softtabs = lNSTANT R0CKHARD ERECTl0NS
Simply disolve HALF A PlLL under your tongue 10min before action,
for results that last all weekend.
Normal retail is $19/PlLL
0rder from us today at the price of $3.33
not interested(0pt-0ut)
___
Hi all. I'm having a severe problem with libtool-ized packages, of
which there are more and more these days, in my environment. I'm
wondering if anyone here can suggest how I should proceed; whether
there's something in libtool that will help me, or whether libtool needs
enhancements, or what.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Definitions:
direct dependency:
A program or library has a direct dependency on a library, if it depends
on some interface that library provides, see node Interfaces for a more
thorough description.
More classifications should applied for direct
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:47:54PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
direct dependency:
A program or library has a direct dependency on a library, if it depends
on some interface that library provides, see node Interfaces for a more
thorough
This is a great document. A few comments --
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
needed-following linker:
A system with a needed-following linker has a means to record
dependencies on other libraries within a library (based on the soname of
the dependency
20 matches
Mail list logo