Re: Bug in libtoolize

2005-02-16 Thread Brian Barrett
On Feb 16, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: | Some suggestions for a fix: | | 1. Do the copy as now, but then have a series of "touch" statements to | modify the mtime/ctime all the relevant AM-specific files in the Right | Order so that the timestamps will be proper. | | 2. Copy the files

multilib

2005-02-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I'm not really too knowledgable of the problem space. What are the problems with multilib? Is it just that libtool searches the wrong libdirs? /usr/lib64 should come before /usr/lib? If that is the case, then surely it can be fixed fairly simply by changing our reliance on 'gcc -print-searc

Re: Bug in libtoolize

2005-02-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Squyres wrote: | I have found a bug in libtoolize which has bit me for a long, long time | but I've never gotten around to checking it out (it was a minor | annoyance). But today, it bit one of my other developers in a rather | awkward moment. So

Re: Bug in libtoolize

2005-02-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Brian Barrett wrote: Could libtoolize just use 'cp -f -p' instead of 'cp -f' when copying the files and leave the timestamps as they are in the original libltdl directory? I admit to not understanding all the details, but that was enough to clear up the problem for me (as one would expect - the

$ORIGIN on various platforms

2005-02-16 Thread rajesh K P
Hi,  On Solaris and Linux platforms the $ORIGIN variable as RPATH is supported and is working.  For AIX '$ORIGIN/../lib' is part of the '-blibpath:' option and after compiling and linking, Using objdump, I see the $ORIGIN../lib in the RPATH section, but still it is not able to find the libraries

Re: Bug in libtoolize

2005-02-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | I'm just googling cp -p portability actually, on first inspection it | seems like this is a no-brainer. I'll google some more to find out why | we're wrong :) If you're in a timezone that is currently awake, send a patch to -patc

How new Check 21 legislation is affecting you...

2005-02-16 Thread Cathleen Baer
Good Afternoon! Recenty intrdocuced legislation requires business and home users to print personal and business checks with security blank check stock and magnetic ink. Please find qualified suppliers at Google by clicking on the followingl link. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&i

Re: multilib

2005-02-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ please forgive the webmailer messing up the lines ] Peter O'Gorman writes: I'm not really too knowledgable of the problem space. What are the problems with multilib? Is it just that libtool searches the wrong libdirs? That's one of them. Libtool aims out to do the same thing the linker does