On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:39:36PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:01:26PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> > >When using the compiler to perform the link and linking against
> > >convenience libraries, is there any reason to lin
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:01:26PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >When using the compiler to perform the link and linking against
> >convenience libraries, is there any reason to link explicitly against
> >the extracted objects of the convenience librar
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:19:02AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Albert Chin wrote:
> | On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> |
> | Ok, this sucks. -no_prelink causes other problems. The SGI compiler
> | leaves template
$B!!!z(B.$B!'!&(B*.$B!&!%(B:$B!y(B.$B!'!&(B*.$B!&!%(B:$B!z(B.$B!'!&(B*.$B!&!%(B:$B!y(B.$B!'!&(B*.$B!&!%(B:$B!z(B.$B!'!&(B*.$B!&!%!y(B.$B!'!&(B
$B(B $B!D!E!&(B
$B(6(6!!Lk$N>pJsJg=8$N3'MM$X(6(6!&!E!D(B
$B!!":";":";":!!"!!~:#G/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Chin wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
|
| Ok, this sucks. -no_prelink causes other problems. The SGI compiler
| leaves template droppings in the ii_files directory that *must* be
| copied when we extract the c
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> Will bad things happen if -no_prelink is used in combination with CC
> -ar? When GNU libtool creates an archive library which is comprised of
> objects from other libtool archive libraries (convenience libraries),
> it extracts the obje
Will bad things happen if -no_prelink is used in combination with CC
-ar? When GNU libtool creates an archive library which is comprised of
objects from other libtool archive libraries (convenience libraries),
it extracts the object files from the convenience libraries and adds
them to the archive
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:41:00AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> When using the compiler to perform the link and linking against
> convenience libraries, is there any reason to link explicitly against
> the extracted objects of the convenience libraries rather than just
> the .a file? I'm running int
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
When using the compiler to perform the link and linking against
convenience libraries, is there any reason to link explicitly against
the extracted objects of the convenience libraries rather than just
the .a file? I'm running into a problem on IRIX with the S
When using the compiler to perform the link and linking against
convenience libraries, is there any reason to link explicitly against
the extracted objects of the convenience libraries rather than just
the .a file? I'm running into a problem on IRIX with the SGI C++
compiler that is solved if I lin
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Johannes Drever wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
If you are using Automake, you should express library dependencies via an
LDADD statement (can be on a per-library level). If the libraries are in
the local build tree, the listed dependency should be the absol
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
If you are using Automake, you should express library dependencies via an
LDADD statement (can be on a per-library level). If the libraries are in the
local build tree, the listed dependency should be the absolute or relative
path to the library's unin
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Johannes Drever wrote:
Hello everyone!
what is the best way to add the dependency on third party libaries to my
project? The project has many "subproject" which i want to able to build
seperately, and each "subproject" depends on other third party libraries.
i am totaly unsur
Hello everyone!
what is the best way to add the dependency on third party libaries to my
project? The project has many "subproject" which i want to able to build
seperately, and each "subproject" depends on other third party libraries.
i am totaly unsure where to put the dependencies, so i would
Hello, Visit Our PharmMail
SH0P.
SP
OF
Vi
ra $200(120p.) Ci
is $300(150p.) Lev
ra $300(50p.)
ECIAL
FER:
ag
al
it
And Many Other!
With each purchase you get:
20%Off All Re-0rders with us
Home delivery
Total c
15 matches
Mail list logo
