$B6L$NMA!&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&$J$i%3%3!#(B?$B6~%b(B?$B(BT$BpA(BO$B^d(B

2005-06-06 Thread info
$B"(=P2q$($kM-L>%5%$%H(B $B!&(B^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^$B!&(B $B!y$b$&$*Ajhttp://www.awg4.com/ss/?goddess $B"(=w;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&@lLg3X9;@8!&(BOL$B!&?M:J!&!_(B1$B!&!&!&$N(B $B5U1g!"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Nx?MJg=8!"%a%kM'!"(BTel$B%(%C%A!"2hA|8r49!"%"%I%l%98r49!"(BSM$BD465$J

Re: is this a correct use for convenience libraries?

2005-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Ed, * Ed Hartnett wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:25:53PM CEST: > > If an interested user uses --enable-netcdf-4, then he gets the classic > library, built as a convenience library, and then the new library, with > the convenience library included. In other words, both libraries are > include

RE: -fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Nope, not yet. Will have to slap myself and my team in that case :) I have read that doc and learned a lot from it. However even Drepper seems to like -fpic in one case: glibc for ppc is compiled with -fpic. PPC can handle big libs even with -fpic. A

RE: -fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Hi Ralf, thanks for your input > > Hi Joakim, > > * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:21:17PM CEST: > > > * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST: > > > > > > > > I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since > > > > that generate

is this a correct use for convenience libraries?

2005-06-06 Thread Ed Hartnett
Howdy all! I have a question about convenience libraries. I have a library which, depending on configure option --enable-netcdf-4, will build my library with, or (by default) without a bunch of radical new features. The idea is that only very interested users need build the new features, and J

Re: -fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Joakim, * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:21:17PM CEST: > > * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST: > > > > > > I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since > > > that generates smaller and faster libs. But I can't find out

RE: -fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > Hi Joakim, > > * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST: > > > > I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since > > that generates smaller and faster libs. But I can't find out how to > > make libtool use -fpic. I don't want to do local changes

Re: -fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Joakim, * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST: > > I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since > that generates smaller and faster libs. But I can't find out how to > make libtool use -fpic. I don't want to do local changes to the > install

Re: AC_DISABLE_STATIC

2005-06-06 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Akim Demaille wrote: (Hm, I'm quite sure I sent this message before, but it didn't come out!) AFAICS, from the source and its effect on configure, AC_DISABLE_STATIC *permanently* disables the possibility to create static library. The documentation says it changes the *defau

-fpic instead of -fPIC

2005-06-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Hi I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since that generates smaller and faster libs. But I can't find out how to make libtool use -fpic. I don't want to do local changes to the installed libtool. build host is linux/x86. Any ideas? Jocke _

$B$3$N2F$K8~$1$FNx$r8+$D$1$^$; $s$+!#(B?$Bw||/(B7$BE7(B$BksoC(B

2005-06-06 Thread info
$B%F%l%S!&;(;[EMAIL PROTECTED]<%H%J!<$rC5$7$F8+$^$;$s$+!)(B http://www.awg4.com/?small $B"#(B---$B"#(B $B"(?75,EPO?$NJ}$O40A4L5NA$G0lK|1_;H$$J|Bj(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]"$l$PM>M5$G$*Ajhttp://www.awg4.com/?small $B"#(B