RE: [png-mng-implement] -version-number and BeOS

2006-04-01 Thread John Bowler
From: Christian Biesinger >It seems to me that this is a bug in any case. Not only is >-version-number inconsistent with -version-info here. Even if BeOS has a >versioning system for libraries and libtool gets support for that, this >would still leave -version-number broken for other platforms w

Re: [png-mng-implement] -version-number and BeOS

2006-04-01 Thread Christian Biesinger
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Except that hack fixes a symptom, but not the underlying issue. It seems to me that this is a bug in any case. Not only is -version-number inconsistent with -version-info here. Even if BeOS has a versioning system for libraries and libtool gets support for that, this w

Re: [png-mng-implement] -version-number and BeOS

2006-04-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:32:30PM CEST: > John Bowler wrote: > >For BeOS try adding 'none' to the end of the test for > >darwin|linux|osf|windows > >on line 3237 of ltmain.sh. We can ship libpng with that because it won't > >break anything which isn't already broken.