Re: AM_FCFLAGS not working as I expect...

2006-05-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Alan, * Alan W. Irwin wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:07:37AM CEST: > > Here is the original problem report. > > I have ifort 9.1 installed. With a clean plplot checkout and the latest > autotools (as recommended) plplot now fails to build. The fortran > compiler is detected and f95

Re: AM_FCFLAGS not working as I expect...

2006-05-13 Thread Alan W. Irwin
We have just added a fortran 9x interface for the PLplot package (to join our already existing fortran 77 interface), and it works well with gfortran when configured using the latest stable autotools packages from GNU. To be specific, the tarballs are autoconf-2.59.tar.bz2, automake-1.9.6.tar.bz2

Re: libtool / SkyOS / ELF

2006-05-13 Thread Christian Biesinger
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I think that should be possible. But of course, that will limit the ways in which you will be able to upgrade your shared libraries later. Also, since I think version_type=none may not have seen so much usage exposure in Libtool, there may have been bit rot. There's stil

Re: [png-mng-implement] -version-number and BeOS

2006-05-13 Thread Christian Biesinger
Nicolas Mendoza wrote: I've seem to have run into a similar problem, what _is_ really the problem? Like I wrote in my original mail on the problem... the problem seems to be that a version type of none is not correctly handled: But, the code in ltmain.sh around line 3236 does not handle a v

Re: fail.at failing on HP-UX

2006-05-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:02:59PM CEST: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:16:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > This should work. Let's just hope there is no legacy system where both > > "test -x" doesn't work and the linker outputs broken binaries. > It works fine. Thank