Hi John,
* John Bowler wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:17:21AM CEST:
> From: Ralf Wildenhues
> >What I still don't understand is the following additional change you
> >also suggest:
> >
> >> $ diff libpng-1.2.9beta7/ltmain.sh libpng-1.2.9beta11 3248c3248
> >> < current=`expr $number_maj
On 16-mei-2006, at 16:06, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to avoid installing some of the static libs built, but I
can't figure out how.
I have a package that contains both "normal" libraries, for which
I'd like both dynamic and static to be installed, and some modules.
I'd like to k
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>John Bowler:
>> The issue here is that libpng on irix has (currently) a major version
>> number of '0', as it does on all other operating systems.
>
>Why should the version number be constant across operating systems?
It isn't. The *major* versio
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:38:05PM CEST:
>
> I'm guessing the issue is that the tarball builder reuses the same
> SVN checkout and just reruns "autoreconf" without "--force". The
> output from "autoreconf --help" says:
>
> Run `autoconf' (and `autoheader', `aclocal
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:19:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> At the same time let's get rid of the
> CONFIGURE-AC argument we're suggesting there but which didn't work right
> anyway. But let's not actually change the functionality, so that what
> works continues to. (A bit fragile, I know;
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:56:28PM CEST:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:19:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > At the same time let's get rid of the
> > CONFIGURE-AC argument we're suggesting there but which didn't work right
> > anyway. But let's not actually change
On 2006-05-17, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the point is that
> autoreconf subdir/foobar.ac
>
> simply won't cause the called tools to use foobar.ac, but the first that
> exists in the list
> subdir/configure.ac
> subdir/configure.in
Yeah, I know.
My thought was that i
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK to apply?
Yes, and thanks.
> Do you think we need to announce this change in NEWS?
Not really.
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:45:37AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK to apply?
>
> Yes, and thanks.
Done, thanks!
Cheers,
Ralf
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
