Hello Markus,
* Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:31:37AM CEST:
> Hmmm.. Ok, maybe i'm wrong with this, but at least i'm successfully
> working with about 600mb sources on interix with the ms toolchain with
> libtool but without libltdl, and it works without any problems (static
> and a
Hmmm.. Ok, maybe i'm wrong with this, but at least i'm successfully working
with about 600mb sources on interix with the ms toolchain with libtool but
without libltdl, and it works without any problems (static and about 50% shared
so far)...
Sorry if the statement was wrong ;o)
Regards, markus
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:05:45AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> * Albert Chin wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:37:11AM CEST:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:25:32AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM CET:
> > > > * Albert
* Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:24:00AM CEST:
>
> Do you want to get it to work with the MinGW GCC, or with the MSVC
> toolchain (i.e. cl.exe, link.exe etc...) ? This makes a big
> difference, since libltdl is really useless with the MS toolchain.
This statement isn't true in gener
Hi!
Do you want to get it to work with the MinGW GCC, or with the MSVC toolchain
(i.e. cl.exe, link.exe etc...) ? This makes a big difference, since libltdl is
really useless with the MS toolchain.
I think we allready talked about wgcc, did we? ;o)
Regards, Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachrich
Hi Albert,
* Albert Chin wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:37:11AM CEST:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:25:32AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM CET:
> > > * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 07:25:32AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM CET:
> > * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Roger While wrote:
> > > > Libtool 1.5.22
> > > > There
Hello David,
Thanks for your bug report.
* David Everly wrote on Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:06:58PM CEST:
> On 6/9/06, David Everly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I seem to be having a problem with libtool 1.5.22 on ia64-hp-hpux11.23
> >using HP's cc/aCC compilers, and it seems to be related to situa
Hello,
Sincere apologies for the huge delay.
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM CET:
> * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Roger While wrote:
> > > Libtool 1.5.22
> > > There is a problem on HP-UX 64 bit
> From: Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Any reason we don't use -bexpall to support -export-dynamic on AIX?
> >From ld(1):
> autoexp
>Automatically exports some symbols from the output module without
>having to list them in an export file. (This option does not
>expo
Brendon Costa wrote:
> Question: Does libtool 1.5.22 for MinGW support shared libraries and
> using DLOpened modules without dlpreopening?
Of course it supports shared libraries.
> If so in the example i gave before for a shared library was created
> using ar cru and not g++ -shared and was link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Brendon Costa wrote on Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:58:24PM CEST:
>> As part of my quest to get libtool and MSVC working together, i thought
>> i would first get libtool working with an example project on a few other
>> systems fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
