libtool ChangeLog ltmain.in [branch-1-5]

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
CVSROOT:/sources/libtool Module name:libtool Branch: branch-1-5 Changes by: Peter O'Gorman pogma 08/01/21 15:01:25 Modified files: . : ChangeLog ltmain.in Log message: * ltmain.in (lt_env): New variable. Use it when running commands. CVSWeb

libtool ChangeLog ltmain.in [branch-1-5]

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
CVSROOT:/sources/libtool Module name:libtool Branch: branch-1-5 Changes by: Peter O'Gorman pogma 08/01/21 17:47:51 Modified files: . : ChangeLog ltmain.in Log message: * ltmain.in [darwin]: look in libdir for dependent libraries, the .la

Re: libtool runs compiler command in wrong locale

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bruno Haible wrote: Find attached a patch for it, relative to libtool-1.5.24 (tested), and a tentative patch relative to the libtool CVS (untested). Hi Bruno, Thanks for the patch, I have applied this to the 1.5 branch. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-21 Bruno Haible [EMAIL

FYI fix darwin dep library linking if .la file moved.

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I applied this to branch-1-5, it is not relevant in HEAD. Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-21 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltmain.in [darwin]: look in libdir for dependent libraries, the .la file may have been moved. Reported by Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: multilib dirs and ld.so

2008-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:29:08PM CET: I give up on trying to find fancy ways to set the paths, ok to apply this to branch-1-5 (and similar for HEAD)? I suppose, yes, but I guess some mention in the documentation would not be bad. Thank you, Ralf

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Maynard Johnson
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Maynard Johnson wrote: # ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 (1.1220.2.455 2007/06/24 02:13:29) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Maynard Johnson wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Maynard Johnson wrote: # ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 (1.1220.2.455 2007/06/24 02:13:29) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There

Re: libtool runs compiler command in wrong locale

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bruno Haible wrote: Find attached a patch for it, relative to libtool-1.5.24 (tested), and a tentative patch relative to the libtool CVS (untested). Hi Bruno, Thanks for the patch, I have applied this to the 1.5 branch. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-21 Bruno Haible [EMAIL

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Maynard Johnson
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Maynard Johnson wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Maynard Johnson wrote: # ./libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 (1.1220.2.455 2007/06/24 02:13:29) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi Maynard, I was hoping that your problems would all be gone :) That certainly helped! We're getting further than before, but now failing when building a C++ library as follows: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -m64 -o libjvmpi_oprofile.la -rpath

libtool finding wrong version of library

2008-01-21 Thread John Cartwright
Hello All, I'm using libtool 1.5.22 on a RHEL 5 64-bit system. My problem is that libtool seems to be picking up an older 32-bit version of a library rather than the newer 64-bit version that I need. I've tried putting the correct one first in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but that doesn't seem to

Re: multilib dirs and ld.so

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:02:59AM CEST: Proposed patches for branch-1-5 and HEAD. Okay to apply? Not quite, I'm afraid. First, please put $CPPFLAGS before $LDFLAGS, for consistency. We should consider just making this whole

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Maynard Johnson
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Hi Maynard, I was hoping that your problems would all be gone :) That certainly helped! We're getting further than before, but now failing when building a C++ library as follows: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -m64 -o

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Maynard Johnson wrote: Please show the contents of libopagent.la and ./libtool --config | grep sys_lib_search, and your gcc libstdc++.la files. Thanks for your patience! The *.la files are attached in a tar ball. Here's the libtool --config output you asked for: Thank you! It is a

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Maynard Johnson wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Hi Maynard, I was hoping that your problems would all be gone :) That certainly helped! We're getting further than before, but now failing when building a C++ library as follows: If you patch your ltmain.sh with this (bad hack) patch then I

Re: multilib dirs and ld.so

2008-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:29:08PM CET: I give up on trying to find fancy ways to set the paths, ok to apply this to branch-1-5 (and similar for HEAD)? I suppose, yes, but I guess some mention in the documentation would not be bad. Thank you, Ralf

GNU Automake 1.10.1 released

2008-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I'm pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.10.1. Automake is a tool for automatically generating `Makefile.in's suitable for use with Autoconf, compliant with the GNU Makefile standards, and portable to various make implementations. This is primarily a bug-fix release, it contains a

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Maynard Johnson
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Maynard Johnson wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Hi Maynard, I was hoping that your problems would all be gone :) That certainly helped! We're getting further than before, but now failing when building a C++ library as follows: If you patch

Re: bi-arch build problem: cannot build 64-bit libs on ppc64

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Maynard Johnson wrote: If you patch your ltmain.sh with this (bad hack) patch then I think it will work. Let me know if it does and I will work on a better patch and test case prior to releasing 1.5.26. Ah, yes . . . SUCCESS! Thanks. Will 1.5.26 be available soon? End of the month,

Re: libtool finding wrong version of library

2008-01-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
John Cartwright wrote: Hello All, I'm using libtool 1.5.22 on a RHEL 5 64-bit system. My problem is that libtool seems to be picking up an older 32-bit version of a library rather than the newer 64-bit version that I need. I've tried putting the correct one first in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH,