On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Charles Wilson wrote:
If you try to exploit this in your build system, to allow "floating"
readline...that will not be a portable construct. libtool is about
portability, not necessarily about squeezing every possible flexibility
out of ELF lazy binding.
It seems that if y
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:31:47AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I feel like today I just watched the movie "Groundhog Day" another 20 times.
> > This topic re-emerges just as often as the one about whether list repli
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel like today I just watched the movie "Groundhog Day" another 20 times.
> This topic re-emerges just as often as the one about whether list replies
> should default to the original sender, or to the list.
>
> It seem
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 12:01:33AM +0200, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Roumen Petrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
libreadline is linked against libncurses on Debian.
>>
>>> Which version ?
>>
>> readline 5.2-3, ncurses 5.7-2.
>
> No,no debian version/
