[PATCH] Fix --verbose option and add new --no-silent option

2008-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (usage): Document new --no-silent/--no-quiet options. Spacing changes. (func_enable_tag): Handle --no-silent/--no-quiet options. Modified --verbose to actually activate opt_verbose. New behavior: --silent disables both normal output and func_verbose output. --verbose

[PATCH] Add func_win32_import_lib_p

2008-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_win32_import_lib_p): New function. --- The second of several smaller patches broken out of, or arising from discussion involving, my original [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static one:

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: Of course, first I need to revise the dlltool patch and get it accepted; there have been some comments on the binutils list. Done. Yay! http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-11/msg00180.html Well, that, and it fixes a test that currently fails. Which one, and can you

Re: Dependencies with static library

2008-11-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Erich Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have an application (A) that depends upon an obscure library made by me (B), that depends on a slightly less obscure library made by someone else (C). I would like to compile A with B as a static library so that the user does not need to install it

Re: static part of a shared library

2008-11-15 Thread Bill Northcott
On 16/11/2008, at 4:02 AM, matej wrote: So imagine this situation: You want to compile a (shared) library. And you also have very good reasons for requiring that a part of the library is build as a static library ONLY and that the rest depends on it. So once more: 1. I want to build a static