On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 12:01 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> If they follow the LSB, then they should be using lib64. However, you
> can configure the linker any number of ways. I tried to get a patch to
> glibc so this path could be determined, but it was rejected.
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
>> system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
>> from these directories.
>
> Are these librari
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
Are these libraries consistently available for 64-bit Linux? If not,
should they be e
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
Signed-off-by: Dan Nicholson
---
libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
