* Matěj Týč wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:41:37PM CET:
> >> Maybe one question towards libtool maintainers is left:
> >> Is that detection of lib/libjpeg.la a desired behavior? I just pass
> >> -ljpeg as an LDFLAGG, not as a LIBADD library...
> >
> > Yes, it is. It is also intentional that .la
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:22PM CET:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2003-06/msg00023.html
Ugh. Well, yes, that's what I feared: that this thing would be a lot
more complicated than apparent at first. The above has certainly seen
more testing than my
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 17:06:28 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:27:42AM CET:
> > but a patch would be needed first ... there's the previous one in the
> > archives that was ported to libtool-1.5 ...
>
> Do you have a URL handy? Anyway, should be littl
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:27:42AM CET:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009 03:00:07 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > IIRC lots of things would break on Linux if we used -Wl,--no-undefined.
> > I don't recall the details, but I'm sure glibc wasn't the only problem
> > child in this ar
>> Maybe one question towards libtool maintainers is left:
>> Is that detection of lib/libjpeg.la a desired behavior? I just pass
>> -ljpeg as an LDFLAGG, not as a LIBADD library...
>
> Yes, it is. It is also intentional that .la files are installed
> (of course for non-convenience archives only),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Mike Frysinger on 3/18/2009 2:27 AM:
>> IIRC lots of things would break on Linux if we used -Wl,--no-undefined.
>> I don't recall the details, but I'm sure glibc wasn't the only problem
>> child in this area.
>
> rather than make it the d
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 03:00:07 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:22:18AM CET:
> > in a project for a LD_PRELOAD module, i like to use -no-undefined because
> > undefined symbols will not work in it at all. i would like to see a link
> > error up front
Hi Mike,
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:22:18AM CET:
> in a project for a LD_PRELOAD module, i like to use -no-undefined because
> undefined symbols will not work in it at all. i would like to see a link
> error up front rather than random runtime failures. googling around s
