Hello,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:28:59PM CET:
>> I had to add -prefer-pic to CFLAGS in order it to work properly... :)
>>
>> Wow... this is an ugly workaround... Any reason why a simple switch to
>> "libtool --mode=li
Hello Alon,
please don't top-post, thanks.
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:28:59PM CET:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:08:03PM CET:
> > > I have some convenience archives linked against several modules.
Thank you for quick response (as usual... :) )
I had to add -prefer-pic to CFLAGS in order it to work properly... :)
Wow... this is an ugly workaround... Any reason why a simple switch to
"libtool --mode=link" is not supported? Is it the first time someone
needs this?
Thanks,
Alon.
---
AUTOMAK
Hello Alon,
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:08:03PM CET:
> I have some convenience archives linked against several modules.
>
> I wish only required objects to be included in modules.
Then make the convenience archives not be convenience archives any
longer, i.e., make them libto
Hello,
Using:
autoconf-2.63
automake-1.10.2
libtool-2.2.6a
I have some convenience archives linked against several modules.
I wish only required objects to be included in modules.
But libtool's usage of --whole-archive forces the whole archive to be
included in the module.
I could not find any
On 12/03/2009 08:20 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
We should probably change the code so that the override can be done
before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, so that at least -DPIC is added consistently,
and that the compile test uses the right flag.
Using a "real" cache variable will do. I'll give it a shot.
P
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:34:06 +0100
Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> So either libtool needs to start mangling, or libltdl needs to stop.
> I'm voting for the former as symbol names can already contain the
> mangled module name.
>
Apparently this wasn't a good idea. Some applications look through the
pr
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:58:47 -0600 (CST)
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> > I upgraded to libtool 2 the other day and was hit by this bug again.
> > Has there been any work on fixing this rather large hole in the preload
> > functionality?
>
> Did someone say
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 03/12/2009 08:20:22:
> From: Ralf Wildenhues
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: Bob Friesenhahn , libtool@gnu.org
> Date: 03/12/2009 08:20
> Subject: Re: -fpic support in libtool?
>
> * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:06:25AM CET:
> > > Libtool can be influe
