Re: Extend libtool dll namespaces for mingw-w64

On 2/1/2010 01:18, Roumen Petrov wrote: JonY wrote: On 1/31/2010 02:14, Roumen Petrov wrote: I don't understand request as the usually final result is .../libfool.la .../libfool.dll.a .../libfool.dll .../libfool.a Also note that makefiles the macros(variables) are libfoo_. Did the requeste

Re: silent installs

Ralf Wildenhues writes: > My problem with that change is that, the relinking and finish really are > information that some users need to know about. If you don't --finish, > then your libraries won't be found by the runtime linker. If relinking > happens as another user than the one who ran `ma

Re: silent installs

On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Sort of makes sense when you install to your host but when install into a DESTDIR as a normal user to later transfer the whole "image" to another system (embedded in my case) it isn't such a big deal. True. Any task likely to be performed as 'root'

Re: Problem creating shared libraries (DLL's) on OS/2

Hi Paul, please keep the list in Cc:, thanks. * Paul Smedley wrote on Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:16:50AM CET: > On 28/01/10 16:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> Our ld.exe is based on a very old version of GNU ld - and as such, >>> doesn't seem to correctly create reloadable object files. >> >> Which

Re: silent installs

Bob Friesenhahn wrote on 2010/01/31 18:23:30: > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > So the question really is whether to make their life harder for > > making your life easier. > > > > I'd like to know what other libtool people think about this, so > > feedback appreciated. > > I

Re: silent installs

On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: So the question really is whether to make their life harder for making your life easier. I'd like to know what other libtool people think about this, so feedback appreciated. I think that some people are hypersensitive to seeing build text and that

Re: Extend libtool dll namespaces for mingw-w64

JonY wrote: On 1/31/2010 02:14, Roumen Petrov wrote: I don't understand request as the usually final result is .../libfool.la .../libfool.dll.a .../libfool.dll .../libfool.a Also note that makefiles the macros(variables) are libfoo_. Did the requester expect if target is libfoo_ make co

Re: silent installs

Peter Johansson wrote on 2010/01/31 16:28:52: > > On 1/31/10 6:10 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/31 08:38:38: > > > >> > >> > >> My problem with that change is that, the relinking and finish > >> really are information that some users need to know about. > >> If

Re: silent installs

On 1/31/10 6:10 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/31 08:38:38: My problem with that change is that, the relinking and finish really are information that some users need to know about. If you don't --finish, then your libraries won't be found by the runtime

Re: silent installs

Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/31 08:38:38: > > [ moving to libtool@ from automake@; this is > > > this particular message is about whether the relinking warning and the > warning about the need to --finish s