On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:26, Lasse Collin wrote:
> On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
>> > Please read the section "Understanding shared libraries
>> > number rules" (it's short):
>> >
>> > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html
>>
>>
On 06/14/2011 11:26 AM, Lasse Collin wrote:
On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
Please read the section "Understanding shared libraries
number rules" (it's short):
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html
If this web page text is corre
On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > Please read the section "Understanding shared libraries
> > number rules" (it's short):
> >
> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html
>
> If this web page text is correct, then I agree that libtoo
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
If I add a new public function to a library and don't modify anything
else, I should do ++current, ++age, revision=0, right? For example, if
the previous version of the library uses current:revision:age = 1:3:0,
adding a new function would make it 2:0:1.
Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately I think that either you missed my
point or I misunderstood something. I try to explain my thoughts better
in this email.
On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Libtool can emulate Linux in how it does the numbering but it is not
> able to change how an OS use
