Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 10:53 +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: In an effort to get to the

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Robert Yang
Great, I verified that we nearly get the speed back: When build xz: libtool-2.4.5 libtool-2.4.2 bash:14s13s dash:12s11s // Robert On 02/10/2015 06:35 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon,

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Richard, On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:36 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing the performance of building xz with make -j1 using each

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing the performance of building xz with make -j1 using each different libtool. The issues come down to

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Richard, On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing the

libtool and sysroot

2015-02-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I noted that --with-sysroot=yes calls(=yes seems undocumented?) lt_sysroot=`$CC --print-sysroot 2/dev/null` Should not $CFLAGS be included here too as gcc may have its sysroot changed with --sysroot? Jocke ___