> -Original Message-
> From: Havoc Pennington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:36 PM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: Alexandre Oliva; Eric Lemings; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config
>
>
>
line :-) I'm not
so familiar with the internals of libtool, just VERY HAPPY to see that it
usually "just work" when I need to port or adapt some libtoolized package...
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingen
the right
semantics (usually a HANDLE is a pointer to a descriptor of where to find
something).
--------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-ma
> wrote:
>
> > On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > in C++
> >> > struct lt_dlhandle
> >> > automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an i
nd everything should read:
typedef struct lt_dl* lt_dlhandle;
but clearly here we have a naming problem :-)
I don't know from where this problem comes; I'm using a quite recent
CVS-libtool (from beginning of october I think) and do not have this
problem.
HTH
Bernard
word that *is* an existing macro (or if
a new macro was created that conflict with my reserved word) :-)
Then we'll have both flexibility *and* (some degree of) security.
Regards,
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess I
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars J. Aas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:58 PM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: 'Akim Demaille'; Pavel Roskin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Forbidden strings
>
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:36 PM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: Pavel Roskin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Forbidden strings
>
>
> >>>>>
of AR_FLAGS, I also know of others using AS_FLAGS for
assembler flags (true these are not so frequent but...)
Whar is AS_xxx used for in autoconf?
BTW, rejecting _A?_ seems acceptable, but A?_ should be restricted to those
we *really* need
Regards,
Bernard
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary V. Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 3:47 AM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: Libtool Mailing List (Adresse de messagerie)
> Subject: Re: Can't install CVS libtool
>
>
> On Fri,
cking up to the installed version) ?
TIA
Bernard
----
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
d() (or
whatever the Win32 name is) the DLL these ELF shared libs could need that
are not yet linked in...
Should be feasible but quite complex anyway ;-(
Cheers,
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingenierie
97 bis, rue de
ibc6
without any complain from the dynamic linker. And that do not seems too much
surprising t me as libc5 and libc6 could be seens as PW and CYGWIN, while
glibc-2.0/glibc-2.1 is cygwin-1.1.0/cygwin-1.1.4.
And anyway, as you say, the UNIX situation is a lot better than the WIN32
one because ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott C. Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:52 PM
> To: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tables of function pointers
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
&
mance is not too
critical, call it at the very beginning of call_function (anyway any good C
compiler like gcc should be able to integrate it in-line, especially if
declared static, so the cost is only a test and branch).
HTH,
Bernard
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingéniérie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:+33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:+33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
