Re: About win32 impgen.c patch

2002-10-22 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Robert, Naofumi, One of the things I am curious about is whether or not impgen.c is going to be used very often in the future. I had been of the notion that the latest set of patches more or less did away with the use of that particular piece of code, although the code for impgen.c itself has n

Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-12 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've seen some looong command lines, not that I've stopped to > count the characters. The 8192 may not be enough for some packages. > Is there a mehtod to use that doesn't check the command line length > or is the point of the limit to break the comma

Re: [Mingw-msys] Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-12 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm fine with it and will support the change [of the maximum command > line length] to a constant. Should that constant be adjusted based > on w9x vs NT? I would not think so; rather, it seems to me that a 8192 character command line maximum will work fo

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
"Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Don't worry about me! I think we are working towards broadly similar goals - > it shouldn't be much effort for me to merge the changes you are making into > my stuff. What I'm wondering is of there is a better variable to use with the import library, as

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob, all, This patch allowed libMagick++ to compile on my machine. The one thing that concerns me is the name of the import library is hard-coded ${lib}.a, which is okay in that the import library looks like "qqq.dll.a" but Max has something going about putting DLLs with the executables and

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The exact same error message is reported without -shared. >From what I can tell, during configure, there is a check for any object files that are included in a C++ link. This object file is then later used to build the shared archive. If you look at

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
This is a new patch in attempts to correct the strange behavior, but note, IT DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY YET. I am posting this because I have a very specific question about the naming of the library. This patch, as it is, causes configure to print out: checking which extension is used for shared l

test to see if the mailing list is working

2002-10-11 Thread Elizabeth Barham
test. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-10 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CVS libtool fails to link C++ DLLs under MinGW, but succeeds under > Cygwin. I have looked at the .la files, and everything appears to be > in order there, so the problem seems to be during the C++ DLL link > phase. The MinGW environment is the base

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-09 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > g++ -shared c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/mingw32/2.95.3-6/../../../dllcrt2.o >.libs/Blob.o .libs/BlobRef.o .libs/CoderInfo.o .libs/Color.o .libs/Drawable.o >.libs/Exception.o .libs/Functions.o .libs/Geometry.o .libs/Image.o .libs/ImageRef.o >.libs/

Re: MinGW libtool DLL failure

2002-10-09 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ideas? > > g++ -shared c:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/mingw32/2.95.3-6/../../../dllcrt2.o >.libs/Blob.o .libs/BlobRef.o .libs/CoderInfo.o .libs/Color.o .libs/Drawable.o >.libs/Exception.o .libs/Functions.o .libs/Geometry.o .libs/Image.o .libs/ImageRe

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-30 Thread Elizabeth Barham
2002-09-29 Elizabeth Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SETUP): GCC now checks -shared to create a dll for Windows targets. Thanks, Elizabeth ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/m

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-29 Thread Elizabeth Barham
2002-09-29 Elizabeth Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * modified _LT_AC_LOCK so that, if AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL is defined and the host matches: *-*-cygwin* | *-*-mingw* | *-*-pw32*, and *-*-cygwin*/gcc*-mno-cygwin*|*-*-mingw* then the check f

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-28 Thread Elizabeth Barham
32*) # cygwin systems need to pass --dll to the linker, and not link Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1133 diff -u -3 -p -r1.1133 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 25 Sep 2002 04:26:19 -

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-28 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, submit a proper patch against the CVS source to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for > proper credit for the fix. Okay, I am satisfied with this and submit this patch for peer review. SYNOPSIS: Adds a linker flag check for "-shared" before those that are all read

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-27 Thread Elizabeth Barham
"Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Elizabeth Barham wrote: > > > > > > Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > The -shared switch is required to build the dl

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-26 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On a related note, I have been having to add a "main" function to the > > DLL's like so: > > > > #if defined(__MINGW32__) && defined(DLL_EXPORT) > > int > > main(int argc, char* argv[]) > > { > > return 0; > > } > > #endif > > > > You shouldn't do

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-25 Thread Elizabeth Barham
This is just a simple report-in about the errors I mentioned having yesterday or the day before. The latest CVS libtool did not have any trouble and made the DLL fine. I'd also like to mention that the whole libtool seemed to work quicker than before. Thank you all very much and great job! On a

Re: [Mingw-users] Whats the latest on libtool and the stub dll libraries?

2002-09-24 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not, totally, but it's being worked upon. I've joined the libtool list > as well in order to help with resolving the issues with mingw32 > host/build/target issues. Hopefully, others that have been actively > working with mingw32 libtool issues can spea