Apple OS ACL files in libtool distribution tarballs

2018-07-17 Thread Eric Bavier
OS X, and don't seem like they should be distributed. Probably not a huge deal, just thought I'd point it out. Eric Bavier, Scientific Libraries, Cray Inc. ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

RE: Libtool error for 64 bit compilation

2018-05-02 Thread Eric Bavier
Looks like your system is missing ‘sed’? and maybe ‘echo’. Could you check the lines mentioned and see which utilities libtool is trying to invoke? Eric Bavier, Scientific Libraries, Cray Inc. From: Libtool [mailto:libtool-bounces+bavier=cray@gnu.org] On Behalf Of irshadahmed desai Sent

Re: Schedule for new libtool release

2016-05-04 Thread Eric Bavier
I'd like to get some comments on the patch I sent at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2015-04/msg3.html Eric Bavier, Scientific Libraries, Cray Inc. From: libtool-bounces+bavier=cray@gnu.org <libtool-bounces+bavier=cray@gnu.

Re: [PATCH] libtool: preliminary support for the Cray compiler.

2015-06-02 Thread Eric Bavier
Has anyone had a chance to look this patch over? `~Eric On 04/14/2015 12:46 PM, Eric Bavier wrote: I'd like to get some additional feedback on this patch for the Cray Compiler Environment support in libtool, now that the copyright assignment process has (finally) gone through. 0001-libtool

Re: [PATCH] libtool: preliminary support for the Cray compiler.

2015-04-14 Thread Eric Bavier
I'd like to get some additional feedback on this patch for the Cray Compiler Environment support in libtool, now that the copyright assignment process has (finally) gone through. From 533d9854c7b3c6c351f5a8d7f2f69e69fb73ad40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Bavier bav...@cray.com Date: Tue, 18

Patches for support of Cray's compiler

2014-11-20 Thread Eric Bavier
I'm sending two patches that are the beginnings of support for Cray's compiler in libtool. I believe this bit of porting will be sufficient for most uses of libtool at this point, and is of course much better than the current state. The first patch is a trivial change to an assumption made in

[PATCH 1/2] tests: Do not assume compiler prefers shared libraries.

2014-11-20 Thread Eric Bavier
Testing whether -static-libtool-libs causes a non-libtool library to be linked dynamically is effectively a test of the compiler's preference in this case. The Cray compiler prefers static libraries if not told otherwise. * tests/static.at [static linking flags for programs]: Do not expect

[PATCH 2/2] libtool: preliminary support for the Cray compiler.

2014-11-20 Thread Eric Bavier
This patch adds preliminary support for the Cray Compiler Environment (CCE) to libtool. Main issues: - When linking a static executable, the value of the STRIP environment variable must be an absolute file name. - Symbols will be stripped from shared libraries during creation if the

[PATCH] tests: cmdline_wrap: Fix shell loop syntax.

2014-10-03 Thread Eric Bavier
Small fix. Not usually a problem if all the tests are passing. ;) From 6f8fb5f0237d392df769ac7beb2523d0e9a6d3a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Bavier bav...@cray.com Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:57:16 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] tests: cmdline_wrap: Fix shell loop syntax. * tests/cmdline_wrap.at

linking libtool archives across toolchains

2014-02-14 Thread Eric Bavier
with libtool when libraries are being built with two or more compiler toolchains. Has this scenario been dealt with before? Is it not a good idea in general? -- Eric Bavier, Scientific Libraries, Cray Inc. ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo