On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:21:34AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:14:43AM CET:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:33:10AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Jacob Meuser wrote on Fri, Jan 27
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 04:33:10AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:16:22AM CET:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:27:42PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Jacob Meuser wrote on Thu, Jan 26
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:27:42PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 03:57:03AM CET:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 02:14:08PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Carlo Contavalli wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:42
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 02:14:08PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
>
> * Carlo Contavalli wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:42:15PM CET:
> > Hello,
> > I have two libraries: libtesta and libtestb. libtestb depends
> > upon libtesta. The compilation process is fine. If I make install,
>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:46:16PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:43:05AM CET:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > > - or, and that is more important, where a lot of the installed
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> - or, and that is more important, where a lot of the installed
> libraries simply were never created with libtool, e.g., because
> they stem from a proprietary OS.
or from BSD ...
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:15:09AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> | The way I see it, there are two possible ways out:
> |
> | 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before
the patch does pu
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:42:07AM CET:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:04:07PM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Marc Espie nerim.net> writes:
> >
> >
f you need context, this is the whole thread:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/6671
> ]
>
> On 2005-09-27, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:15:11PM +, Olly Betts wrote:
> >> I did wonder about getting my
:
> > next time ]
>
> I'm following it on gmane, but an explicit Cc: isn't a problem.
>
> > * Jacob Meuser wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:10:36AM CEST:
> >> just add -lstdc++ manually. trust me, that works fine. I really don't
> >> see why
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:41:38AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> |
> | Thorsten's statement is somewhat misleading. you can definitely link
> | libraries and dlopened modules against librari
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:58:36PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> | gcc -shared creates a shared library.
> |
> | On OpenBSD, shared libraries do not link against other shared libraries.
> | The main programme must link a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:45:40PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> * Thorsten Glaser wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:05:53PM CEST:
> > Olly Betts dixit:
> > >On 2005-09-21, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> IIRC, archive_cmds on openbsd does not use -nostdlib, so h
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Guilhem Lavaux wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >Which other systems do the same thing? All OpenBSD versions? Do they
> >intend to change this? How about the other BSDs?
> >
> >
> >
>
> I guess they won't change this anytime soon looking at their cvs
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:53:25AM CET:
> > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >[definitions]
> >
> > my head is already swimming because "dependent", "dependency" and
> > "dependence" a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 08:58:35AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:07:20AM CET:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:00:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > &
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:59:08PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> Bob,
>
> The following log is still valid for where the breakdown occurs:
> http://dague.net/libtool.txt.
>
> That is a complete build log, plus all versions of the software.
>
> The problem comes at:
>
> /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:00:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > Actually, I'd say the opposite is true ... the LONGER link l
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:00:28PM CET:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > >
&
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 17:19 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Doesn't this patch cause Linux to be more equal than other operating
> >
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > It does assume that all library dependencies are registered, yes.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:00:09AM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2004-11-15T20:33-0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> ) their packages as soon as possible. besides, it is arguable that
> ) libtool should be fairly well adapted to RedHat by default, the
> ) 1.5 branch has been around for a wh
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 07:36:21PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2004-11-15T17:19-0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> ) system incrementally. There is also the point that the libtool which
> ) comes with a Linux distribution has likely already been hacked to be
> ) more lenient. If FSF libtool become
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:01:38PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> >but this only works is all the libraries have .la files, right?
> >what happens if not all those libraries were built with libtool?
> >how would libtool f
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:20:58AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> >>>Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >>>
>
> Doesn't this patch cause Linux to be more equal than other operating
> systems, thereby causing free applic
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 15:34 +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> > Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >
> > > I submitted keybuk-linux-deplibs.patch to libtool-patches back in March,
> > > and there was a slight objection from Bob and
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 09:04:31PM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >You seem to be a victim of a package install where every package has
> >used its own unique installation prefix. It seems to me that most
> >systems use just one or two installation prefixes
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:53:15AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:02 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > > It doesn't care about package versions, but it has to care about library
> > > versions and paths to libraries.
> >
>
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 05:09:08PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2004-11-14T14:56-0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> ) On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> ) > $ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/libgdiplus10/lib/pkgconfig
> ) You seem to be a victim of a package install where every package has
> ) used i
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:53:15AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:02 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > > It doesn't care about package versions, but it has to care about library
> > > versions and paths to libraries.
> >
>
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:57:27AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 15:27 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 10:21:19AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > It's just that their functionality
> > > intersects an
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 10:21:19AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 23:02 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:27:28AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:31 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > On Fri, No
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:27:28AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:31 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:33:02PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:20:13AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > > A
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:33:02PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:20:13AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > Albert Chin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 03:43:48PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 14:24 +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 04:11:16PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Geoff wrote:
> >>For
> >>example, the user was not aware that there was a libxml2
> >>under the /usr/X11R6 tree as well as under the /usr/lib
> >>tree. LibMagick was apparently built and tested with the
> >>lib
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:02:16PM +0100, Geoff wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:47:53 -0500 (CDT)
> Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Unknowledgable is not the same as unintelligent.
>
> Thank-you for saving my blushes.
usually two things that have 'and' between them are r
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:38:07PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Geoff wrote:
> >>
> >>IMO, such hardcoding of library location should be
> >>discouraged. why does libtool add the full path of the .la
> >>file, instead of-L -l? even if the is
> >>wrong, there are other ways
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi Brad, hi Libtool hackers,
>
> I've recently bumped into a libtool problem with older (3.3) OpenBSD on
> m68k, where linking of one kaffe library fails because the linker
> doesn't find the verifier libraries, as they don't end u
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 06:46:35PM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 18:22, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > it uses verbose output to figure out what the compiler will do, and
> > then duplicates it ... but the compiler will still do it was doing,
>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:41:07PM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 17:25, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > >>
> > >> After a long time playing arround I solved my two problems as follo
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:57:43PM -0400, Carlos Fangmeier wrote:
>
> Hi all again.
>
> After a long time playing arround I solved my two problems as follow:
>
> 1.- Multiple Inclusion: comment out line 'postdeps="-lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s
> -lgcc_s" ' from /usr/local/binlibtool .
this is because l
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:07:37PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >>On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >>>I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
I do believe that exports symbols from a shared lib. He has static libs.
whole_archive_flag_spec is the variable in libtool to look at, but
that's about all I know about it.
>
>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:03:04PM -0600, James Bigler wrote:
> There is no libGL.la. I want to make one without having to hack it by hand.
Ah, I guess I didn't understand what you meant, sorry.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:48:47PM -0600, James Bigler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to create a .la file for libraries which were created
> without libtool? I know I can hack a file together piece by piece, but
> I was wondering if there was a mode in libtool that would generate it
> for
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 12:22:33AM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled ImageMagick-5.5.7-15 (any newer version is totally broken
> because of automake) on OpenBSD. However, libMagick++ is busted.
>
> When running the regression tests, all test programs
Hi,
I've compiled ImageMagick-5.5.7-15 (any newer version is totally broken
because of automake) on OpenBSD. However, libMagick++ is busted.
When running the regression tests, all test programs linked with
libMagick++ report:
can't load library '--library=gcc'
$ strings /usr/local/lib/libMagic
47 matches
Mail list logo
