Re: Passing Dynamic Linking Flags?

On 11/02/2012 12:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Leek, Jim wrote: I'm using libtool 2.4.2 on IBM's BG/Q platform with the xlC compiler. In general it is working fairly well, but I have one issue. Unlike most Linux systems, on BG/Q static linking is the defau

Passing Dynamic Linking Flags?

ol to pass those flags only when I want to build the binary dynamically? So far I've only found the place where I can put flags to make libtool build the binary statically. Thanks, Jim ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Libtool is linking the wrong library (location) in and I can't figure out what's causing it.

You're observation was key to that solution. I suspect the DESTDIR would have also worked but since I didn't need the files in the build directory once the rpmbuild was completed, it made sense to clean them up. Thank you very much, Jim. _

Libtool is linking the wrong library (location) in and I can't figure out what's causing it.

don't think there are any environment variables set outside of the scripts. Any information would be most appreciated. Thanks, Jim. ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: How to use libtool for target builds? libstdc++ conflicts

++ library that is associated with the gcc and g++ version is used. Thanks, Jim G On 11/08/2011 04:56 PM, Jim Galarowicz wrote: Hi, I'm building our OpenSpeedShop performance tool to run on the backend nodes of a Cray-XE machine. We use the libtool, m4, autoconf, and automake auto

How to use libtool for target builds? libstdc++ conflicts

tting the /usr/lib64/libstdc++.la files included in my target build library .la files. Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong? Is there a way to build a version libtool, for the target, and specify the libraries that should be used (i.e. the ones that correspond to the compi

Re: move to git

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:53:23AM CEST: >> I'm beginning to think that our time might be better spent >> investigating an alternate conversion method: cvs2git. >> Unfortunately, I might not have t

Re: move to git

"Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I don't quite understand what happened. With the repo conv

Re: move to git

right? > > I don't quite understand what happened. With the repo converted from > CVS, the tag SHAs were all different, but they already pointed to the > same tree object. After the filter-branch rewrite, they now all have > the same SHA. I suspect the bug happens earlier. Ji

In need of some libtool/autoconf help

#x27;m still just trying to get a handle on how all these tools fit together, since, as I mentioned, I'm very much a novice when it comes to autoconf. Also, after typing this post, I realized it might be better suited to the libtool mailing list, and I will post it there as well, but I

Make home improvements, or take-cash out

Title: wednesday Re-finance now, even with bad-credit! *Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged. *Best Customer Service *Lowest Interest-Rates in Years *SAVE $100-$400 per month Our easy application only takes 1 minutes. Visit here for more information

control your impotence! elephant

Special offer! You don't need to make large orders to get the product at this price per dose. All the prices mentioned are retail prices! One Time DISC0UNT 0RDER for Via*gra* ! T0DAY Its only $3.20 per dose. Pack 1: Generic Via*gra* , 10 x 20mg Only $ 68.00 Tadalafil Pack 2: Generic Via*gra* ,

Business opportunities - advertisement

Thank you for your valuable time. I will keep this advertisement short and to the point. I also have massive amounts of email to sort through daily. Perhaps you should save this ad for a more convenient time in your busy schedule. Here is a website that advertises for, among other things, In

Suppressing --whole-archive

Is there a way to suppress the insertion of --whole-archive/--no-whole-archive placed around static libraries when linking them with a shared library?  I have an autotools project containing common code that is linked as several convenience libraries which are subsequently used by both binaries and

Re: [kaffe] Re: dotnet platform support / gnu config.sub (long)

nse to call the target "Java", since it's only going to be used by tools generating Java byte code, which will run on Sun's JVM. Of course it will still run on other virtual machines that can't use the Java trademark, but that shouldn't be of any concern to the tools generating the code, IMHO. Cheers, - Jim ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool