On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 18:10 +0300, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> On 29/05/2024 16:27, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Ping ?
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 19:53 +0200, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote:
> > > On 31/01/2024 17:15, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > Has some
On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 17:06 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> This fix seems to have been lost:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2019-05/msg0.html
Ping? I think the current state in libtool is that static ASAN works for LLVM
now but
not for gcc as gcc has libasan/li
This fix seems to have been lost:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2019-05/msg0.html
What happened to the release?
Joakim
Has some variant of
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2022-04/msg00010.html
been discussed/considered ?
Joakim
Ping ?
On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 15:41 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> While googling for a fix for bug#21455,
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2015-09/msg00012.html ,
> I came across:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/libtool/
While googling for a fix for bug#21455,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2015-09/msg00012.html ,
I came across:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/libtool/libtool-2.4/use-sysroot-in-libpath.patch?id=release-2010.12
This appear to be the correct fix
I noted that --with-sysroot=yes calls(=yes seems undocumented?)
lt_sysroot=`$CC --print-sysroot 2/dev/null`
Should not $CFLAGS be included here too as gcc may have its sysroot
changed with --sysroot?
Jocke
___
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 2010/01/31 08:38:38:
[ moving to libtool@ from automake@; this is
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/11347/focus=11374
this particular message is about whether the relinking warning and the
warning about the
Peter Johansson troj...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/01/31 16:28:52:
On 1/31/10 6:10 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ralf Wildenhuesralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 2010/01/31 08:38:38:
My problem with that change is that, the relinking and finish
really are information that some users need
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote on 2010/01/31 18:23:30:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
So the question really is whether to make their life harder for
making your life easier.
I'd like to know what other libtool people think about this, so
feedback
bonz...@gnu.org wrote on 22/12/2009 09:16:59:
From: Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org
Here is where I was at. After that it was not immediate how to
use a tag-dependent cache variable. Strictly speaking however
using a cache variable is not needed to make the PIC test
overridable.
The patch
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 16/12/2009 22:56:44:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: libtool@gnu.org
Date: 16/12/2009 22:56
Subject: Re: relinking and finish warnings
Hello Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund
Now that I am using libtool's .la objects when build our apps
we notice that the executables in the build tree becomes
a script that run the binary form the .libs subdir.
This has the side effect that out apps notices a change in argv[0]
when we run them from within the build tree.
Previously
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 16/12/2009 22:56:44:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: libtool@gnu.org
Date: 16/12/2009 22:56
Subject: Re: relinking and finish warnings
Hello Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 14/12/2009 19:52:54:
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:42:51AM CET:
How do I add -static on a per lib basis?
Currently there is no way to do so, but it is a TODO item and a proposed
patch to add this functionality (search
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 14/12/2009 07:46:30:
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:23PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 13/12/2009 11:14:58:
For dependencies on libraries within the build tree, prefer relative
file references over link flags; i.e
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 13/12/2009 11:14:58:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: libtool@gnu.org
Date: 13/12/2009 11:15
Subject: Re: lib seach path
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:33
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 13/12/2009 11:18:31:
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:05:13PM CET:
Ralf Corsepius wrote on 12/12/2009 07:20:05:
The whole purpose of DESTDIR is being set at install-time and not to be
AC_SUBST'ed anywhere.
I.e
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote on 12/12/2009 07:20:05:
On 12/12/2009 12:57 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Roumen,
* Roumen Petrov wrote on Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:36:54PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
AC_ARG_VAR([DESTDIR], [perform staged installation using DESTDIR])
This
We have this big directory structure which contains both apps and libs.
The apps needs lots of libs that are scattered in various sub dirs.
It is rather messy to add lots -LDIR options to apps linking stage.
Is there a way to tell libtool after it has built a lib to do a subinstall of
the
lib
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 08/12/2009 20:13:13:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: libtool@gnu.org
Date: 08/12/2009 20:14
Subject: Re: rpath
Hello Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Tue, Dec 08, 2009
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 10/12/2009 06:16:40:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: libtool@gnu.org
Date: 10/12/2009 06:16
Subject: Re: rpath
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:50:14AM CET
rpath gets set to /usr/local/lib but this is wrong for me.
I am crosscompiling and point builddir to /some/dir and install
into /some/dir/opt/x/y so I want rpath to point to /opt/x/y
What controls rpath in libtool?
___
We just upgraded libtool from 1.5.26 to 2.2.6 and our build
broke. Our host requires 2.2.6 so keeping the old appears difficult.
Even though we only run autoreconf manually in our project, the new libtool
slipped into the project and the build broke.
I can fix this by rerunning autoreconf -i -f
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 08/12/2009 20:57:17:
Hello Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:23:39PM CET:
We just upgraded libtool from 1.5.26 to 2.2.6 and our build
broke. Our host requires 2.2.6 so keeping the old appears difficult.
Even
what do I write in Makefile.am to make libtool build dyn libs only?
It seems like libtool always wants to build both static and dyn libs
but I want to build some libs dynamic only to save build time/space.
Jocke
___
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 03/12/2009 08:20:22:
From: Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Cc: Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, libtool@gnu.org
Date: 03/12/2009 08:20
Subject: Re: -fpic support in libtool
Several years ago I asked libtool to support -fpic too but
I don't see it in never libtool(s). I guess it isn't
impl.?
The simplest fix for adding -fpic I can come up with is
doing sed -i 's/-fPIC/-fpic/' aclocal.m4
This is a bit clumsy as one can easily forget
to do this when running aclocal
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote on 03/12/2009 03:27:55:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Several years ago I asked libtool to support -fpic too but
I don't see it in never libtool(s). I guess it isn't
impl.?
The simplest fix for adding -fpic I can come up
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote on 03/12/2009 08:20:22:
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:06:25AM CET:
Libtool can be influenced by the configure script by influencing this
definition which gets output in the libtool script:
# Additional compiler flags
Hi
I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since that
generates smaller and faster libs.
But I can't find out how to make libtool use -fpic. I don't want to do local
changes to the installed libtool.
build host is linux/x86.
Any ideas?
Jocke
Hi Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST:
I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since
that generates smaller and faster libs. But I can't find out how to
make libtool use -fpic. I don't want to do local changes
Hi Ralf, thanks for your input
Hi Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:21:17PM CEST:
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:10:31PM CEST:
I want to use -fpic instead of -fPIC on a powerpc(linux) target since
that generates smaller
34 matches
Mail list logo
