From: Glenn Randers-Pehrson
On 5/17/06, John Bowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) We could change the major version to be (say) '1' at the next
major
release, but we can't change it in libpng 1.2.x
Should we do that? We haven't, so far, in 1.4.0betaN. We could skip
right to 1.4.1 now.
I
From: Glenn Randers-Pehrson
On 5/17/06, John Bowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) We could change the major version to be (say) '1' at the next
major
release, but we can't change it in libpng 1.2.x
Should we do that? We haven't, so far, in 1.4.0betaN. We could skip
right to 1.4.1 now.
I
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Bowler:
The issue here is that libpng on irix has (currently) a major version
number of '0', as it does on all other operating systems.
Why should the version number be constant across operating systems?
It isn't. The *major* version
From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Bowler:
The issue here is that libpng on irix has (currently) a major version
number of '0', as it does on all other operating systems.
Why should the version number be constant across operating systems?
It isn't. The *major* version
weird that libtool should make a major version number of 0 impossible
and not
offer any explanation of what is going on.
John Bowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
from the two bugs (failure in 'none' and irix fails if the major version
number is 0) we haven't seen any problems (yet).
John Bowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
