Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtool-1.3d

2001-04-03 Thread Kevin Atkinson
Have all these changes been merged in the multi-language branch? I noticed that this branch still using a ltconfig. -- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users sourceforge net http://www.ibiblio.org/kevina/ ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Support for C++ under Win32

2001-04-03 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On Friday 30 March 2001 3:54 am, Kevin Atkinson wrote: I was wondering what the status is for supporting C++ on Win32 in the multi-language branch of libtool. The g++ support for win32 should not be any worse than for other libtool supported

Support for C++ under Win32

2001-03-29 Thread Kevin Atkinson
so that I can dynamically load a dll at run time so that Pspell will work under Win32. Thanks in advance. -- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users sourceforge net http://www.ibiblio.org/kevina/ ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org

Re: Dynamically loading C++ Modules on Solaris

2001-01-31 Thread Kevin Atkinson
xt and see if that works --- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users sourceforge net http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/ ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Dynamically loading C++ Modules on Solaris

2001-01-22 Thread Kevin Atkinson
://pspell.soucreforge.net). So far I have only been able to get this working fully on Linux and have not herd from anyone success on other platforms. Thanks in advance. PS: I did talk to you guys earlier about some of these issues a while back in case you remember. --- Kevin Atkinson kevina

Re: Dynamically loading C++ Modules on Solaris

2001-01-22 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Kevin Atkinson wrote: I am trying to get the dramatic loading of C++ libraries to work on Solaris but I am running into problems with the fact that shared C++ libraries are not provided on many systems because Gcc does not enable them by default. Is there a way to get

Re: Dynamically loading C++ Modules on Solaris

2001-01-22 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Lars J. Aas wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:57:33PM -0500, Kevin Atkinson wrote: : I should also add that I am using the multi-lib branch of libtool. multi-language, perhaps? Yes that's what I meant sorry. --- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users sourceforge net http

Re: Problem with ltdl.h

2000-11-30 Thread Kevin Atkinson
`something' :-) How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_struct lt_dlhandle'? Done! Thanks. It works find now. -- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users sourceforge net http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/ ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ma

Re: Problem with ltdl.h

2000-11-28 Thread Kevin Atkinson
overridden by another definition of the name, which is what the `typedef' does. So are you saying that you are not going to fix it. It does NOT appear to be valid C++ code, thus when the header file is used in C++ programs it prevents them from being compiled. --- Kevin Atkinson kevina at users

Re: Problem with ltdl.h

2000-11-28 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It does NOT appear to be valid C++ code I've just managed to compile: typedef struct foo foo; Yes that will compile but typedef struct foo * foo Won't, which is what the line

Re: Problem with ltdl.h

2000-11-27 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote: I just updated to the latest CVS version of libtool and I noticed two problems. 1) Even though I defined LT_NON_POSIX_NAMESPACE I still can't get lt_ptr_t to work. After looking at the header file I discovered the really is LT_FUBAR_NAMESPACE

Re: ML libtool: shared libs linked against static ones

2000-06-10 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Ossama Othman wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 07:45:43PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: Well since the ML branch was giving me s many problems I switched to the HEAD brach for the time being becuase I wan't to get a release out this weekend. What I

Nasty dependency problem.

2000-06-05 Thread Kevin Atkinson
ice: pspell pspell-modules pspell_aspell aspell pspell pspell_ispell Does anyone know of a good solution to this problem? Everything works fine when shared libraries are used, but then again when shared libraries are used I don't need to perform stage two because I can load the modules at run time.

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-06-03 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 3 Jun 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On May 30, 2000, Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:46:34AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: ltconfig: `./ltcf-gcj.sh' does not exist Not that big of a deal but quite annoying, especially since libtoolize doesn't

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Atkinson
table but non-writable sections collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `libtest.la' This is using the latest libtool ml checked out at arounf 5:00 PM EST. I am using a CVS Version of Autoconf and automake not sure of the last checkou

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Atkinson
Makefile.am: AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign lib_LTLIBRARIES = libtest.la libtest_la_SOURCES = test.cc configure.in: AC_INIT(test.cc) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(test, 1.0) AC_PROG_CXX AC_LANG_CPLUSPLUS AM_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_LIBTOOL_CXX AC_OUTPUT(Makefile) test.cc: #include iostream void foo() { cout

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-30 Thread Kevin Atkinson
th working with the released version. I remember trying the released version and had some problems with automake making the file exec.C as the executable -- Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Kevin Atkinson
when two different shared libraries have slightly different versions of the same static library. -- Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-28 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Stephan Kulow wrote: Ossama Othman wrote: Hi Stephan, On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 10:10:44AM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote: Kevin Atkinson wrote: Hopefully since KDE will be using it some KDE people will help to improve the C++ support. I am sure

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-26 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Michael Matz wrote: On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote: Maybe I am missing something here but can't you just let g++ handle all the C++ issues. If G++ does call the native linker and you need to pass special options too it this native linker is bound

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-25 Thread Kevin Atkinson
it this native linker is bound to be the same as the linker used for C programs. So then can't C++ libtool get the necessarily options to pass (like the rpath stuff) from the C part of libtool. Or am I missing something? --- Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/

Re: Solution to Preload problem Feature Request

2000-04-14 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 14 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: My fear is that others might start to depend on this feature, which might solve the problem for them, but not for people who happen to install libraries in places other than /usr or /usr/local, like me. In fact, I've always advocated against these

Re: 2nd Try: Shared libraries w/ C++ and libltdl

2000-04-13 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 13 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 12, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 12, 2000, Michael Bletzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another option you might to try is listing libstdc++.a as an object when you

Re: Solution to Preload problem Feature Request

2000-04-13 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 14 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 14, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So will listing out ALL the required libraries, provided that they are in the library search path (ie no rpath nonsense) work on most system in both the shared and static case? I hope so

Re: 2nd Try: Shared libraries w/ C++ and libltdl

2000-04-11 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Ossama Othman wrote: Hi Kevin, On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 02:43:23AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Ossama Othman wrote: Right. I don't have access to all of the platforms supported by libtool's C library support so I wasn't able

Re: 2nd Try: Shared libraries w/ C++ and libltdl

2000-04-11 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 11 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 11, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're linking C++ libraries to a C program? That seems a bit odd. Did I misunderstand you? Why? I have a library that is written in C++ but I would like C programs to be able to use

Re: Making libtool use c++ to link c++ shared libraries.

2000-03-28 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 28 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: I tried that and it STILL insists on using gcc to make the shared libraries. Do you mean your Makefile runs: libtool --mode=link g

Re: Making libtool use c++ to link c++ shared libraries.

2000-03-28 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 29 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 29, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AC_LIBTOOL_CXX AM_PROG_LIBTOOL You must swap these two lines. AM_PROG_LIBTOOL creates libtool, AC_LIBTOOL_CXX requires AM_PROG_LIBTOOL, then appends to it, but then the explicit

Re: Multiple interfaces to a single library.

2000-03-20 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 20 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 19, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to have to [two?] different interfaces into the same library. Yes 2. You can't do that in a single library, in general. It's a matter of the linker finding one library expecting

Re: Multiple interfaces to a single library.

2000-03-20 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 20 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 20, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current version of libtool's does not support linking to other libtool's libraries. Does the current CVS version? Yep, sorry, forgot to mention that :-( How stable is the CVS

Re: Multiple interfaces to a single library.

2000-03-19 Thread Kevin Atkinson
to one and pspell modules and possibly other spell checkers will link to the other. On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote: For one of my projects (pspell, http://pspell.sourceforge.net) I want to have to different interfaces into the same library. One interface I hope to rarely have