that the anwer is yes, even though what he said
was a bit convoluted.
Here's the ng thread, where:
== Matt Schalit
== Gary Vaughn
== Dave Prosser
-
On Saturday 21 April 2001 10:02 pm, Matthew Schalit wrote:
The only other
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:25 am, Matthew Schalit wrote:
Hi Folks,
Hi Matt,
Sorry for the slow response.
Np. I'm sure you're busy.
Your patch worked.
Yes, the dlopen API is available.
The only other thing I noticed was this section
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static
archive into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do.
Hi Folks,
I got an answer from comp.unix.sco.programmer.
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:06 am, Matthew Schalit wrote:
Hi Gary,
Thanks for the followup.
If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static archive
into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do. Yo
Hello Goodly Folks,
Thank you for all your work on making libtool so
portable and necessitating that I learn how to spell
dependencies :o)
I recently had the chance to compile libtool-1.3.5
for my SCO UnixWare 7.1.1 box, often referred to as an
i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.1
Hi Folks,
On SCO UnixWare 7.1.1, the header file dl.h is
found as sys/dl.h.
I just checked out CVS libtool today, and it looks like
I'll have to change a few files:
$ find . | xargs fgrep -l "dl.h"
./ChangeLog.0
./ChangeLog
./ltdl.m4
./doc/libtool.texi
./libltdl
./libltdl/CVS/Entries
