Re: How to make a C++ -module?

2016-06-23 Thread Patrick Welche
I just made a sandbox with autoconf-2.69, automake-1.15 and git libtool. Running the tests on NetBSD-current/amd64, gcc 5.4.0, binutils 2.26, I see several failures, including: 61: flags.at:24passing CXX flags through libtool libtool cxx which appears to be the same problem, as

How to make a C++ -module?

2016-06-21 Thread Patrick Welche
I'm trying to create a C++ loadable module. I thought it would be as easy as: === configure.ac === AC_INIT(hellow, 0.0.1) AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR(m4) AC_PROG_CXX AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) LT_INIT AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile) AC_OUTPUT

linking trouble

2013-01-11 Thread Patrick Welche
My project builds fine on NetBSD, but I just tried it on Ubuntu 12.04.1 and linking the final dasher binary fails with unresolved symbols which are in libatspi. I am playing spot the difference, but not getting far... Overall, the binary dasher links to Gtk2/libdashergtk.la, and libdashergtk.la

Re: ltdl and C++

2011-09-20 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:34:22PM +0200, Alessandro Candini wrote: Hi everyone. I have a problem making ltdl library work with some C++ code. I have implemented my personal version of the example at the end of Chapter 7 in the book Autotools by John Calcote. Basically it is the same, but I

Re: ltdl and C++

2011-09-20 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:45:34PM +0200, Alessandro Candini wrote: ../src $ ldd hello not a dynamic executable Well spotted by Nick! (I should have asked for file hello) Cheers, Patrick ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

32/64 bit on sun4u

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Welche
On another list a poster thought that libtool was doing the wrong thing(tm), but it seems to be rather that config.guess needs to be given hints about sun4u. This means that this probably isn't the right list - but which one is? Essentially, he is running a 64 bit system, and is hoping for

Re: .lai files

2008-09-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:25:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'm trying to debug the libsasl make install error: libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libsasldb.lai /usr/local/lib/sasl2/libsasldb.la install: .libs/libsasldb.lai: stat: No such file or directory but I can't

Re: .lai files

2008-09-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:56:28PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Please note that Automake 1.10 has changed handling of *_LDFLAGS, quoting from the NEWS file: So that explains why everyone isn't clamouring - I am using automake 1.10a Thanks, Patrick

.lai files

2008-09-17 Thread Patrick Welche
I'm trying to debug the libsasl make install error: libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libsasldb.lai /usr/local/lib/sasl2/libsasldb.la install: .libs/libsasldb.lai: stat: No such file or directory but I can't seem to find any documentation on where/when a .lai is created. (Just a

Re: rm -f

2007-12-21 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 06:21:30PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:04:59AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello, * Patrick Welche wrote on Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:58:51PM CET: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:27:48PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: The general idiom

Re: rm -f

2007-12-21 Thread Patrick Welche
Hello Ralf! I think that question still stands, but my rm -f is actually from just above that spot: Sorry, I haven't had time to look at this issue, and it may well be a few more days. Adding it to delfiles makes the algorithm use quadratic amount of disk space, rather than linear.

Re: rm -f

2007-12-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:04:59AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Only if you have a dummy file to remove. In libtool it's easier to just add test -z $files || $RM $files as appropriate. Which tests are failing for you, Patrick? I assume this is NetBSD? First good news: it is test

Re: rm -f

2007-12-15 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:27:48PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: The general idiom for this is 'rm -f dummy $files', so that even if $files is empty, you are still passing an argument to rm, and the -f avoids failure on the dummy argument. Elegant! P

rm -f

2007-12-14 Thread Patrick Welche
I am seeing trivial test failures just because % rm -f usage: rm [-f|-i] [-dPRrvW] file ... e.g., /stresstest.at:251: eval '$LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o $rels ub2/liba.la $relsub/a.lo' $linkargs stderr: usage: rm [-f|-i] [-dPRrvW] file ... stdout: libtool: link: rm -fr

Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?

2006-11-24 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:14:09PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Mooney wrote on Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:50:23PM CEST: ... Probably, yes. I seem to recall discussion on this list in the past about why distributions were doing that, but I don't recall what any of the reasons were.

Re: test failures

2006-10-27 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:39:12PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Patrick Welche wrote on Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:37:39PM CEST: All with CVS autotools, the following tests fail for me: 16: link-order2.at:25 Link order of deplibs. libtool This one is different

test failures

2006-10-26 Thread Patrick Welche
All with CVS autotools, the following tests fail for me: 16: link-order2.at:25 Link order of deplibs. libtool 35: nonrecursive.at:70 compiling softlinked libltdl libtoolize automake autoconf 36: nonrecursive.at:94 compiling copied libltdl libtoolize automake autoconf

Re: interdependent shared library problem

2006-10-25 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Patrick, * Patrick Welche wrote on Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:17:42PM CEST: /usr/X11R6/lib doesn't need to be in the default set of paths searched by the loader. As I mentioned, with a different compile line to the one

Re: interdependent shared library problem

2006-10-16 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:17:54PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:53:41PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: With CVS autotools of this month I am getting in a pickle trying to build a program which depends on a shared library which depends on a shared library

Re: DESTDIR, relink dependent lib, RPM and AIX

2006-10-16 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:18:31AM +0530, Jaimon Jose wrote: ltmain.sh (GNU libtool 1.2345 2006/09/20 19:08:21) 2.1a ^^ just raised a smile :-) Patrick ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

interdependent shared library problem

2006-10-15 Thread Patrick Welche
With CVS autotools of this month I am getting in a pickle trying to build a program which depends on a shared library which depends on a shared library. This is on NetBSD which uses rpath. An example based on one from autobook is attached which builds hello - libhello - (libSM,libICE)

Re: interdependent shared library problem

2006-10-15 Thread Patrick Welche
P.S. libtool --config tells me: hardcode_automatic=no inherit_rpath=no link_all_deplibs=unknown Patrick ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

hardcode properties?

2006-08-22 Thread Patrick Welche
While trying to build cvs-freetds with cvs autotools, I got: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/local/freetds/src/odbc' /bin/ksh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -pthread -g -O2 -I/usr/include -Wdeclaration-after-statement -export-symbols-regex '^(SQL|ODBCINST).*' -module

Re: hardcode properties?

2006-08-22 Thread Patrick Welche
Hi Ralf! Yes. Please send ../../libtool --config ../../libtool --debug --mode=link ...(rest of link line)... OK - attached.. Cheers, Patrick toralf.gz Description: Binary data ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: 284-gary-report-macro-files-for-aclocal.diff

2005-09-30 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:23:03PM CEST: Okay to commit? Observe major nit below, then commit, please! By the way, I believe Patrick meant a generic command line switch to list the

Re: FYI: bootstrap update; pdksh specialties

2005-09-05 Thread Patrick Welche
`libtoolize'. Reported by Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Re: the ltdl issue(s)

2005-09-01 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Even better: MAKE=gmake /bin/sh -vx ./bootstrap You know my setup too well ;-) One with a broken `make', and a `find' without `-path', I guess. The rest should be followup failures. My find claims to have -path, but I also

Re: Fortran 90/95 (FC) support

2005-08-12 Thread Patrick Welche
, tests/fcdemo-static.test: Use. Do not fail gratuitously but SKIP on compilers that look like they could be Fortran 77-only. Reported by Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Now I have: PASS: tests/f77demo-static.test PASS: tests/f77demo-make.test PASS: tests/f77demo-exec.test

Re: static lib with libtool 1.5

2005-08-11 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Jeremie LE HEN wrote: IMO, the user is confused while reading this. Furthermore, the first statement is wrong in regard to the example on the NetBSD box (burger) : burger$ libtool compile gcc -g -O -c foo.c mkdir .libs

Re: static lib with libtool 1.5

2005-08-11 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Because in general they are _not_ identical on NetBSD. Show foo.c. Ah - it was a very simple foo.c ;-) quartz% cat foo.c void foo(void); void foo(void) { int i; i=0; } Cheers, Patrick

Re: static lib with libtool 1.5

2005-08-11 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: They also have position-independent relocations. Try 'objdump -x' on my above example. Ah yes: .libs/foo.o: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0019 R_386_GOTPC _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_

Re: tracking a recursive macro

2005-07-07 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:41:41PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Are you aware of the recent macro loop in CVS HEAD/branch-2-0 Libtool in conjunction with special Autoconf versions? /me checks it isn't 1 April... nope Which exact Autoconf/Automake/Libtool versions do you use (if CVS

tracking a recursive macro

2005-07-06 Thread Patrick Welche
I don't really know where to ask for help: trying libtool as the last macro mentioned is an autoconf fixup for libtool.. I'm trying to build apr with cvs autotools, and essentially do libtoolize sinclude(build/{libtool,ltsugar,ltversion,ltoptsion,argz}.m4) in configure.in (instead of

LTDL_CONVENIENCE comment

2005-02-08 Thread Patrick Welche
I was just reading LTDL_CONVENIENCE, where it states: Note that LIBLTDL and LTDLINCL are not AC_SUBSTed, nor is AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS called. Yet, a few lines below it: AC_SUBST([LIBLTDL]) AC_SUBST([LTDLINCL]) Just an oversight? Cheers, Patrick

Re: TODO

2004-11-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 09:04:31PM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: You mean that the installed .pc files need to be altered by the user to give things a hope of linking? ;-) Hate to chime in, but I always seem to have to add -Wl,-R... to the *.pc files, so have not ended up being a fan of

gnu vs bsd make

2004-10-28 Thread Patrick Welche
I just came across a difference between between GNU make and BSD make: % cat makefile1 $(var)/foo: bar $(var)/bar: echo making bar % make var=. -f makefile1 ./foo make: don't know how to make bar. Stop make: stopped in /usr/src/local/libtool/err % gmake var=. -f makefile1 ./foo

compile problem

2004-08-23 Thread Patrick Welche
I just tried to build cvs libtool with cvs auto* all from today, and get: make all-recursive Making all in . cd . /bin/ksh /usr/src/local/libtool/config/missing --run automake-1.9a --gnits libltdl/Makefile.am: C objects with per-target flags but `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' not in `configure.ac' Am I

make prob

2004-08-12 Thread Patrick Welche
With cvs code from just now: make all-recursive Making all in . cd . /bin/ksh /usr/src/local/libtool/config/missing --run automake-1.9a --gnits libltdl/Makefile.am: C objects with per-target flags but `AM_PROG_CC_C_O' not in `configure.ac' Cheers, Patrick

Re: cvs build prob

2004-07-29 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 06:38:56PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: If you revert my patch, or fetch the prepatch revision from my arch mirror, and bootstrap with HEAD autoconf, does the new AS_SHELL_SANITIZE from autoconf prevent the crash when setting output_verbose_link_cmd? That's it - I

Re: cvs build prob

2004-07-28 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 01:25:43PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The workaround in this case is easy. Just omit the outer quotes and remove the inner backslashes: output_verbose_link_cmd=`$echo X$output_verbose_link_cmd | $Xsed -e $no_glob_subst`

Re: cvs build prob

2004-07-27 Thread Patrick Welche
I can reproduce the sed: 1: s/\*/\\\*/g: invalid command code error with the minimum configure.ac which contains LT_LANG(C++) which calls _LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG, which calls AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS, which calls AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP, which has # The `*' in the case matches for

cvs build prob

2004-07-26 Thread Patrick Welche
I get: libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 1.5b, revision AR=ar AR_FLAGS... libtool: but the definition used by this AC_PROG_LIBTOOL comes from revision libtool: 1.1527. libtool: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from revision AR=ar AR_FLAGS... libtool: of libtool 1.5b and

Re: quoting bug

2004-07-05 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 08:37:18AM +0100, Gary V.Vaughan wrote: Counting parens shows that removing a set will stop the AC_DEFUN from being closed. Yes, you are right! and now I can't remember what I was doing way back when when I thought this solved a problem, so all I'm left with is my wrong

quoting bug

2004-07-03 Thread Patrick Welche
I just did a cvs update and found that my ancient patch must have been missed.. Please apply! Cheers, Patrick Index: m4/libtool.m4 === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/m4/libtool.m4,v retrieving revision 1.76 diff -u -r1.76

bug in lt_lang_default_config

2004-04-29 Thread Patrick Welche
All tests pass before and after this patch.. but the configure scripts become happier.. Cheers, Patrick Index: m4/libtool.m4 === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/m4/libtool.m4,v retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -r1.69 libtool.m4

Re: C linkage problem when C++ library is used.

2004-04-15 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:21:11PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: If a program which is based on C language depends on a library which is implemented in C++, the C++ compiler should be used to link the program. Otherwise C++

Re: no serial number?

2004-03-10 Thread Patrick Welche
used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined src/Makefile.am:1: src/Makefile.am:1: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' src/Makefile.am:1: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. from automake) Cheers, Patrick On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:41:54PM +, Patrick Welche

more on serial

2004-03-10 Thread Patrick Welche
LT_INIT is defined using AC_DEFUN_ONCE. There is no documentation for this macro in autoconf.texi, and aclocal doesn't know about it, or at least, it doesn't pick up the fact that as LT_INIT appears in configure.ac, it should include m4/libtool.m4. (s/AC_DEFUN_ONCE/AC_DEFUN/ changes this) I don't

Re: no serial number?

2004-03-09 Thread Patrick Welche
, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:41:54PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: libtoolize: warning: no serial number on `/usr/local/share/libtool/m4/libtool.m4', not copying. libtoolize (GNU libtool 1.1434 2004/02/23 16:59:14) 1.5a -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 206060 Feb 26 14:55 /usr/local/share/libtool/m4/libtool.m4

Re: tagdemo-make.test fails

2004-02-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:25:20PM -0800, Lon Canaday wrote: Sorry, Here are the details. -Wl,/home/lcanaday/build_tmp/libtool/libtool-1.5.2/tests/_inst/lib main.o(.text+0xe): In function `main': /usr/include/g++-3/iostream.h:106: undefined reference to `cout'

Re: tagdemo-make.test fails

2004-02-19 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:25:20PM -0800, Lon Canaday wrote: Sorry, Here are the details. main.o(.text+0xe): In function `main': /usr/include/g++-3/iostream.h:106: undefined reference to `cout' Does this help? Cheers, Patrick Index: tests/tagdemo/foo.cpp

ltversion

2004-02-15 Thread Patrick Welche
* Makefile.am (pkgmacro_DATA): We have to distribute m4/ltversion.m4 because it can be needed before the Makefile that generates it exists. but: libtoolize: warning: no serial number on `/usr/local/share/libtool/m4/ltversion.m4', not copying. :-( Cheers, Patrick

Re: libtool macros installed in pkgdatadir?

2004-01-29 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:26:50AM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: .. Anyway, the point is that you should not fear this. Installing third-party macros in /usr/share/aclocal will continue to work. I think the problem arises when packages assume that libtool.m4 lives in /usr/share/aclocal

ltdl.lo

2004-01-22 Thread Patrick Welche
On NetBSD-1.6ZH/i386, with today's cvs: Making all in libltdl gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/local/libtool/libltdl' /usr/local/bin/bash ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CC gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=config.h -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -O2 -c -o ltdl.lo ltdl.c mkdir .libs gcc

Re: undefined symbol woes

2003-12-15 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:36AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Patrick Welche wrote: | I was hoping to not create shared modules [[snip]] | | libtool --mode=link gcc -module -export-dynamic -o mod_auth_basic.la mod_auth_basic.lo

undefined symbol woes

2003-11-27 Thread Patrick Welche
I am finding out the hard way about .la .lo etc files trying to compile cvs httpd, with static modules, but I still haven't found the small example to illustrate the problem. Essentially libtool --mode=link gcc -export-dynamic -o httpd modules.lo modules/aaa/mod_auth_basic.la translates as gcc

Re: undefined symbol woes

2003-11-27 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:27:51PM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: mod_auth_basic.a doesn't contain mod_auth_basic.o. Are you running with - --disable-static? I was hoping to not create shared modules, but I can't actually see relevant flags in the libtool invocation. The compile which uses

Re: bootstrapping CVS libtool

2003-11-26 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:41:30AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I don't understand the above, but bootstraping libtool, I see: ~ 1: remove $prefix/share/aclocal/l(ibtoo|td)l.m4 of old releases at install ~ time ~ 2: keep copies of the latest versions only in $prefix/share/libtool/m4

Re: bootstrapping CVS libtool

2003-11-22 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 10:41:15AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: .. Running configure still does not result in a libtool script so I get this error: /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/libtool' CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS= CONFIG_COMMANDS=libtool /usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status config.status:

Re: bootstrapping CVS libtool

2003-11-22 Thread Patrick Welche
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 10:18:03PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 10:41:15AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: .. Running configure still does not result in a libtool script so I get this error: /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/libtool' CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS

ac_aux_dir problem [was Re: quick changes question]

2003-11-19 Thread Patrick Welche
Somehow during execution of configure, ac_aux_dir becomes unset (!) To repeat, create this highly complex configure.ac: AC_INIT([autoprob],[1.0]) AC_PROG_LIBTOOL AC_OUTPUT automake -a cp /usr/local/share/automake/config.{sub,guess} . libtoolize aclocal autoconf Then apply something like the

Re: quick changes question

2003-11-18 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:15:51PM +, Patrick Welche wrote: Can you think of something which has changed in the last 3 weeks that could cause this? (It looks like top_builddir or something like that is no longer set, but I am not changing autoconf, just libtool.. (supplementary question

quick changes question

2003-11-17 Thread Patrick Welche
I have yesterday's CVS autoconf, automake, apache httpd-2.0. Using ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5a (1.1296 2003/10/21 15:03:52) apache's buildconf does its thing, and my only problem is undefined module symbols in the final link, however ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5a (1.1331 2003/11/14

mdemo2 failure

2003-10-26 Thread Patrick Welche
With today's CVS, on NetBSD-current/i386, gmake 3.79.1 just 1 test failed: % cd tests % gmake MAKE=gmake TESTS=mdemo2-conf.test mdemo2-make.test VERBOSE=-x check ... gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/local/libtool/tests/mdemo2' = Configuring in mdemo2

auxdir unset

2003-10-26 Thread Patrick Welche
With today's cvs libtool, I came across the following trying to autogen atk: libtoolize: putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `'. so, it seems that auxdir is unset. I think this is strange, as I vaguely remember the existence of a AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR_DEFAULT ? I suppose normally one wouldn't see

libtoolize.in typo

2003-10-15 Thread Patrick Welche
Self explanatory I hope! Cheers, Patrick Index: libtoolize.in === RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/libtoolize.in,v retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.25 libtoolize.in --- libtoolize.in 14 Oct 2003 22:52:57 - 1.25

SED ?

2002-12-13 Thread Patrick Welche
Using cvs libtool from just now, which passed everything :-), I tried bootstraping sasl, and found that the libtool generated died at progname=`$echo $0 | ${SED} 's%^.*/%%'` modename=$progname because SED was empty - where should SED be defined? (Adding SED=sed just before the above had it

Re: AWARD NOTIFICATION

2002-10-22 Thread Patrick Welche
You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay out of US$1,500,000.00 in cash credited to file REF NO. REF: WBL/67-B773524441. This is from total As far as I remember, within the last ?month? a French court forced a company who promised a prize of XXX to actually pay it. (Was one of

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:30:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: ... HAVE_LIBDL is a misnomer, and should perhaps be renamed to HAVE_DLOPEN, since the additon of a library that contains dlopen is handled separately. Good idea :) Patrick ___

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully this will make the problem

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully this will make the problem

Re: ltdl/mdemo test

2001-09-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 08:29:17PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: On Monday 10 September 2001 18:59, Patrick Welche wrote: I mumbled about mdemo-exec and friends failing a while back, but hopefully this will make the problem a bit clearer: I already stated that the problem lies in the fact

Re: make check failures

2001-07-17 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I am using automake from the stable branch, and autoconf-2.50, so I can't vouch for how well things work with development versions... you might try that configuration before digging too much. I have received a lot of patches

Re: make check failures

2001-07-17 Thread Patrick Welche
A quick look says that in ltdl.c, presym_open() if you get there with a call to lt_dlopen(0), filename is null, so if (!filename) { filename = @PROGRAM@; } then later: if (!syms-address strcmp(syms-name, filename) == 0) as address==0, we look for syms-name ==

make check failures

2001-07-16 Thread Patrick Welche
PASS: mdemo-static.test PASS: mdemo-make.test PASS: mdemo-exec.test PASS: mdemo-inst.test PASS: mdemo-unst.test PASS: mdemo-conf.test PASS: mdemo-make.test FAIL: mdemo-exec.test FAIL: mdemo-inst.test PASS: mdemo-unst.test PASS: mdemo-shared.test PASS: mdemo-make.test FAIL: mdemo-exec.test FAIL:

FAIL: demo-make.test

2001-03-12 Thread Patrick Welche
Using source updated Mar 12 11:42 GMT on NetBSD-1.5S/i386 I have a few failed tests. In directory tests running demo-conf.test then demo-make.test gives... creating hell /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o hell.static -static main.o libhello.la gcc -g -O2 -o hell.static main.o

Re: FAIL: demo-make.test

2001-03-12 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:09:54PM -0500, edward wrote: ... On Monday 12 March 2001 7:08 pm, Patrick Welche wrote: Using source updated Mar 12 11:42 GMT on NetBSD-1.5S/i386 I have a few failed tests. In directory tests running demo-conf.test then demo-make.test gives

Re: depdemo failures

2000-07-07 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 10:02:57PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: I don't (yet) understand the logic here, but the attached patch fixes all the tests for the head branch for NetBSD-current (on i386 at least). I'm still trying to understand why this works and if its definitely the way to go. I

depdemo failures

2000-07-05 Thread Patrick Welche
As some of the depdemo tests are failing for me under NetBSD-1.5B/i386, I just tried running depdemo-shared.test depdemo-make.test depdemo-exec.test I don't understand the last part of the output from depdemo-make.test: /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o depdemo.static main.o

Re: test failed

2000-05-30 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Linus Nordberg wrote: Mocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Mon, 29 May 2000 23:29:15 -0500: # make check | grep FAIL FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: hardcode.test FAIL: build-relink.test