Re: GMP: IBM mainframe build results

2007-07-19 Thread Tim Van Holder
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Van Holder wrote on Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:57:56AM CEST: [...] Both compiles and links are affected. For the linking, automake puts the -o at the end itself, so it is at least partially to blame. Then again, libtool does already move the -o to a place before

Re: GMP: IBM mainframe build results

2007-07-17 Thread Tim Van Holder
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Van Holder wrote on Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 04:11:43PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: - [LIBTOOL] by default, the compilers require that files come last on the command line, and many versions of libtool (including the one included with GMP) break this rule when

Re: GMP: IBM mainframe build results

2007-07-13 Thread Tim Van Holder
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: - [LIBTOOL] by default, the compilers require that files come last on the command line, and many versions of libtool (including the one included with GMP) break this rule when configure has determined -c and -o can both be used (it puts the -o last). To work around

GMP: IBM mainframe build results

2007-07-13 Thread Tim Van Holder
[cc'ing the libtool list because of the issues marked [LIBTOOL] below; these may or may not already be resolved in more recent libtools - the version included with gmp is 1.5.6 according to ltmain.sh (1.220.2.94)] I just finished building gmp 4.2.1 under OpenMVS (370-ibm-openedition, the Unixy

Re: Libtool: Microsoft dumpbin as name lister

2005-08-22 Thread Tim Van Holder
Regarding dumpbin not being present in the 2003 version, I *think* it's just missing from the free toolkit and that it is still going strong in the real releases of Visual Studio. OK. I just can't test it then. Also, there seem to be third-party programs named `dumpbin'. Does your1 test av

Re: MinGW link against an MS Windows import library

2004-04-15 Thread Tim Van Holder
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Earnie Boyd wrote: So all that is needed is for libtool to accept .lib as an extension and for libtool to (possibly naively) assume that if a similarly-named DLL exists that the .lib file is a DLL link library? Yes and no. For one thing, there is no

Re: MinGW link against an MS Windows import library

2004-04-14 Thread Tim Van Holder
Bill Jones wrote: So the basic question is how do I specify a static import library with a *.lib extension to be used by libtool for resolving the symbols provided by a non-libtool DLL when building a dependent DLL with libtool? The trivial solution is of course to make a copy of the third-party

Re: libtool support for intel icc compiler---NEW PROBLEM

2003-03-21 Thread Tim Van Holder
AUTHORS commitdepdemoltdl.m4 mkstamp tagdemo bootstrapconfig.guess docltmain.c NEWS tests ^ Run this script, and it will do what's needed to produce configure. $ ./bootstrap or $ sh bootstrap should do it. -- Tim Van

Re: libtool support for intel icc compiler---NEW PROBLEM

2003-03-20 Thread Tim Van Holder
so that aclocal will find and use the libtool macros. -- Tim Van Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: linking with fltk-1.1

2002-02-12 Thread Tim Van Holder
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 03:01, Ted Irons wrote: We are using cygwin (1.3.9) with fltk-1.1 on a Windows NT machine. Our C++ package uses autoconf, automake, and libtool to maintain the build system. CXXFLAGS contains -DWIN32. LDFLAGS contains -no-undefined and -mwindows. configure.ac

Re: Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'

2001-10-23 Thread Tim Van Holder
Tim == Tim Van Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tim Something like this, perhaps? For sure! OK - installed (this may be resolved in bash 2.06; if so, I'll try to remember to amend this entry accordingly). ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL

Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'

2001-09-21 Thread Tim Van Holder
I asked about this a whil ago, but since I didn't receive any comments, I'm asking again. bash's behaviour with regards to the 'set' builtin has changed in 2.05: 3. New Features in Bash b. When `set' is called without options, it prints function defintions in a way that allows them

Re: Overriding startfiles and C library with libtool libraries

2001-07-16 Thread Tim Van Holder
My reflex reaction is to say that this probably isn't supported by libtool, but then I have very little practical cross compilation know-how. My first thought that was this is really GCC's job - its specs file tells it what start/end files to link with. So if it's a real cross-compilation

AC_REQUIRE mis-schedules AC_PROG_CXX and AC_PROG_CXXCPP

2001-07-01 Thread Tim Van Holder
There is a problem with the way autoconf 2.50 (as well as current CVS HEAD) schedules AC_PROG_CXX and AC_PROG_CXXCPP if both are AC_REQUIRE'd. libtool.m4 has AC_DEFUN([_LT_AC_LANG_CXX], [AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CXX]) AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CXXCPP]) ])# _LT_AC_LANG_CXX but autoconf generates a

Re: libtool awfully slow on MacOSX?

2001-06-27 Thread Tim Van Holder
libtool is taking 30-40s to execute on my 366MHz iBook running Mac OS X, compared with approx. 2s on my 166MHz x86 running Linux, and I'm pretty sure it was even quicker still on my iBook when *that* was running Linux, so: Is it just me mine, or is there some reason libtool is very slow