Re: PATCH: Fix mips*-*-linux*

2001-10-26 Thread scott hutinger
This type of thing has caused, and still causes problems on the PPC platform (and ARM). Any mixing (which H.J. Lu fully understands) doesn't work. The problem is that many platforms (x86) do not see any problems with the mixture. This causes this problem to continue, as people don't understand

Re: Darwin patches?

2001-10-04 Thread scott hutinger
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Max Horn wrote: [...] > > At 1:35 Uhr +0200 22.09.2001, Max Horn wrote: > >1) with regard to dlpreopen, there is yet another quoting problem. > >The libtool file generated from HEAD-cvs contains three lines like > >this: > > > >global_symbol_to_c_name_address="sed -n -e 's/^

Re: Darwin patches?

2001-10-04 Thread scott hutinger
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Max Horn wrote: > >Ok, cdemo tests fail. What are the requirements from admin for > >modification to cdemo if needed? Sorry I have to ask, sometimes people > >have various reasons for not allowing specific modifications. > > The problem is not in cdemo, this is a test, and

Re: Darwin patches?

2001-10-04 Thread scott hutinger
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Max Horn wrote: > > > The reason is, > >> > >> [drawin1.[0-2]]] is a bit behind, since Darwin is at 1.4.1 as of October > >> 1st. Although < 1.4.0 is a major change in some instances, although not > >> so much with libtool. > > There is a good reason for this check - it