Ralf Wildenhues ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> (It'd be great if you could enable your mailer to wrap long text lines.)
>
> * Kevin F. Quinn wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:18:57AM CET:
> > Thanks people; I understand (now) that libtool supports many targets,
> > each with their own compilers. I g
Hi Kevin,
(It'd be great if you could enable your mailer to wrap long text lines.)
* Kevin F. Quinn wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:18:57AM CET:
> Thanks people; I understand (now) that libtool supports many targets,
> each with their own compilers. I guess that means the question
> becomes, wh
Thanks people; I understand (now) that libtool supports many targets, each with
their own compilers. I guess that means the question becomes, why set -DPIC on
targets that use gcc, where that compiler defines __PIC__ if it's generating
PIC code (at least since gcc 2.8.1 to my knowledge - I don'
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 08:21 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> > Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>
> >> Apologies if this is a stupid question, but please could someone
> >> explain to me why libtool sets '-DPIC' for shared libraries, while
> >> gcc reliably d
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but please could someone
explain to me why libtool sets '-DPIC' for shared libraries, while
gcc reliably defines '__PIC__' when it generates PIC code?
Setting '-DPIC' encourages people to d
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> Apologies if this is a stupid question, but please could someone explain to
> me why libtool sets '-DPIC' for shared libraries, while gcc reliably defines
> '__PIC__' when it generates PIC code? Setting '-DPIC' encourages people to
> do '#ifdef PIC' when surely '#ifdef _
Apologies if this is a stupid question, but please could someone explain to me
why libtool sets '-DPIC' for shared libraries, while gcc reliably defines
'__PIC__' when it generates PIC code? Setting '-DPIC' encourages people to do
'#ifdef PIC' when surely '#ifdef __PIC__' would be more reliable
