Re: A portable way to link in all objects

2003-06-10 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Robert Boehne wrote: > Ronald, > > Libtool purposely does not support linking static libs into shared libs > when it can help it, so even if a patch with a proper copyright > assignment was posted, it wouldn't get past me. The idea I was looking at is not linking static libs in

RE: A portable way to link in all objects

2003-06-02 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Howard Chu wrote: > > Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > I am looking for a way to portably tell libtool to link in all objects > > of a given static library. [snip] > Link all of the static archive members into a single object file. This works > on all platforms: > (mkd

RE: A portable way to link in all objects

2003-05-29 Thread Howard Chu
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf > Of Ronald > Landheer-Cieslak > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: A portable way to link in all objects > > > Hello all, > >

A portable way to link in all objects

2003-05-28 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Hello all, I am looking for a way to portably tell libtool to link in all objects of a given static library. Basically, my problem is this: I have an object file containing "constructor" and "destructor" functions, which are not called from any program using my library, but which are run autom