On Monday 02 April 2001 2:31 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is fast becoming a large post-1.4 issue to my mind...
>
> What? Did you really mean to have this problem addresses in 1.4?
Yeah, I though it was going to be a simple
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is fast becoming a large post-1.4 issue to my mind...
What? Did you really mean to have this problem addresses in 1.4? 1.4
doesn't even have piecewise linking, IIRC.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.un
On Monday 02 April 2001 12:49 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that even if there are, there is little option but to do
> > platformwise duplicate removal if we are to avoid common problems with
> > command line lengths.
>
> Ye
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB).
Thanks
> Okay to release 1.3d?
Ok with me.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnu
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> > Certainly for modern UNIX architectures, however, I get the impression
>> > from Alexandre that there are platforms which do re
Hello.
On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > I see. Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably
> > > generate excessively large link commands for KDE.
> >
> > Yes it does =(O| Although ugly, Robert has applied the f
Hello.
On Sunday 01 April 2001 1:16 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > > I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB).
> > >
> > > Why also MLB? Was it really broken there too? I ask, because I
> > > _definitely_ got multiple libraries in li
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:50 am, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > > >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> > > >> duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
> > > >
> > > > Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What
On Friday 30 March 2001 4:07 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
> >> duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
