RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so),...: > >Tim, > >hpux under pa-risc (even 64-bit) still uses the .sl extension even where >64-bit ELF libraries are concerned. Only under the Intel architecture >does it use the .so filename. If you want

Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Ross Alexander
uired at lot more hand holding to create shared libraries.  In other places it wasn't really necessary even though it could result in output wasn't strictly true. Tim Mooney wrote: In regard to: Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so),...: Sorry, that was no

RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Boehne, Robert
HP-UX (.sl vs .so) In regard to: Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so),...: >Sorry, that was not obvious, I've been thinking you were trying with >a later version than that and simply asking for future plans of a >feature not visible so far, possibly also browsing

Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so),...: >Sorry, that was not obvious, I've been thinking you were trying with >a later version than that and simply asking for future plans of a >feature not visible so far, possibly also browsing into the other

Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Guido Draheim
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Guido Draheim] I am not a maintainer, and I do not want to give any premature answer on your question, but the wording of your question has the feeling of a mail sent to a commercial hotline. Interesting. You have more experience with commercial hotlines then me.

Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Guido Draheim] > I am not a maintainer, and I do not want to give any premature > answer on your question, but the wording of your question has the > feeling of a mail sent to a commercial hotline. Interesting. You have more experience with commercial hotlines then me. > Since I have no hpux ia

Re: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Guido Draheim
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: It has recently come to my attention that the latest versions of HP-UX uses two different file suffices on shared libraries on ia64. Traditional PA-RISC libraries use .sl endings, while ELF style ia64 libraries (32 and 64 bits) use .so endings. Checking the ChangeLog in

Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)

2003-10-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
It has recently come to my attention that the latest versions of HP-UX uses two different file suffices on shared libraries on ia64. Traditional PA-RISC libraries use .sl endings, while ELF style ia64 libraries (32 and 64 bits) use .so endings. Checking the ChangeLog in CVS, http://savannah.gnu.o