Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 15 February 2001 4:47 am, Sam TH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-27 Thread Sam TH
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:04:29PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > >> It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > >> > >> # Make sure that $var conta

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alexandre Oliva writes: > I can't find this entry in my copy of ChangeLog. Are you sure this is > >from libtool's CVS tree? http://subversions.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/libtool/ltmain.in?only_with_tag=ild-branch Revision 1.79.2.2 Seems like the ChangeLog in the main branch was reduced down to "m

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says >> >> # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries >> # and add them in reverse order This is definitel

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Sam TH
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 07:54:33PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > > > # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries > > # and add them in

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries > # and add them in reverse order > The ChangeLog only has > * ltmain.in: Merged Thomas' ild-pa

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > > > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, > > > > Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think this bug > > is present in it. > > This behaviour exists in

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alexandre Oliva writes: > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, > > Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think this bug > is present in it. This behaviour exists in both MAIN and the ML branch. It was introduced in ltmain.in rev. 1.79.2.2 (ILD br

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 07:34:08PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, this is the third reply to this mail that I've sent. > > Sorry. It seems that all of us have been busy lately. > > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, this is the third reply to this mail that I've sent. Sorry. It seems that all of us have been busy lately. > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-14 Thread Sam TH
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-06 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-06 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. > c++ -o foo ./libs/lib1.a ./libs/lib2.a Which version of libtool are you usi

Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-06 Thread Sam TH
I'm attempting to libtoolize a large package, and am running into a significant problem. For reasons which are known only to itself, gcc refuses to link all the static archives that make up this package unless they are declared multiple times on the command line. So, I want to do something lik