Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:38:05PM CEST:
I'm guessing the issue is that the tarball builder reuses the same
SVN checkout and just reruns autoreconf without --force. The
output from autoreconf --help says:
Run `autoconf' (and `autoheader', `aclocal',
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:19:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
At the same time let's get rid of the
CONFIGURE-AC argument we're suggesting there but which didn't work right
anyway. But let's not actually change the functionality, so that what
works continues to. (A bit fragile, I know; I
On 2006-05-16, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free, any kind of feedback is helpful. Esp. we're looking for
packages that are broken by the new Autoconf, so that unintended
incompatibilities can be fixed before the release.
I've tried it now. I didn't have to modify any of the
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:41AM CEST:
On 2006-05-16, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free, any kind of feedback is helpful. Esp. we're looking for
packages that are broken by the new Autoconf, so that unintended
incompatibilities can be fixed before the
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:41AM CEST:
I've tried it now. I didn't have to modify any of the configure scripts
at all.
Any self-grown or third-party macros that use exit(3) in compile tests?
Not that I
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
Is there likely to be a 1.5.24 release soon?
Oh dear. Don't ask about my original plans. They were something like
this: have Autoconf-2.60 in March, then Libtool-1.5.24 soon
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:48:55AM CEST:
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
I know Libtool-1.5.24 is important to get out, due to the regressions I
put in 1.5.22. And it will be
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- there was actually a regression in 1.5.22 over 1.5.20 which caused
some paths to be incorrectly removed on FreeBSD and some other BSD
variants. Has since been
